This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Get Started
- News & Events
- Collaboration
- Education Services
- Technologies
- Next-Generation Firewall
- GlobalProtect
- Threat Prevention Services
- Endpoint Protection
- SSL Decryption
- App-ID
- Content-ID
- User-ID
- 5G
- IoT Security
- Cloud Identity Engine
- Panorama
- AIOps for NGFW
Network Security
- Prisma Access
- Prisma Cloud
- Prisma SD-WAN
- Cloud NGFW for AWS
- CN-Series
- VM-Series:
- Private Cloud
- OCI
- Alibaba
- AWS
- GCP
- Azure
Cloud Security
- Cortex XDR
- Cortex XSOAR
- Cortex Data Lake
- Cortex Xpanse
Security Operations
- Resources
About Hamid.Saffarzadeh
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Announcements
We are conducting regularly scheduled maintenance over the weekend, which could cause some downtime on LIVEcommunity. We apologize for any inconvenience.
- LIVEcommunity
- About Hamid.Saffarzadeh
07-01-2022
8Posts
2Likes
0Solutions
Jul 01, 2022Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by Hamid.Saffarzadeh
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 97 | 06-22-2022 04:10 AM | |
| 281 | 05-12-2022 01:15 AM | |
| 362 | 05-10-2022 01:19 AM | |
| 438 | 04-07-2022 03:23 AM | |
| 316 | 01-07-2022 04:50 AM |
My Liked Posts
| Subject | Likes | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Like | 01-06-2022 06:27 AM | |
| 1 Like | 12-09-2020 06:48 AM |
Posts I Liked
| Subject | Likes | Author | Latest Post |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Like | |||
| 1 Like | |||
| 1 Like | |||
| 1 Like |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 01-03-2020 02:18 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 07-01-2022 01:09 PM |
| Posts | 8 |
| Total Likes Received | 2 |
06-22-2022
04:10 AM
Hi team, Hope all is well. We have an issue with the GP client app upgrade through GPO when users are working remotely. Users who work in the corporate have no issue with the GP upgrade, however, it seems remote users do not have access to the shared folders as it seems the GP gets disconnected during the upgrade. I thought the whole .msi would be downloaded from the remote servers to the local machine and then the upgrade would be carried out. The error is something like "\\...\GlobalProtect64-5.2.0.msi cannot be found. verify that you have access to this location..." Thank you in advance for your thoughts and ideas. Hamid Saffarzadeh
... View more
05-12-2022
01:15 AM
Thank you Pavel, One more question if you don't mind. Do you have any idea How long it takes for BGP to converge at the time of a manual firewall failover? Regards,
... View more
05-10-2022
01:19 AM
Hi Team, Trust all is well. IN the documents it is only mentioned that the "Auto" link-state makes the convergence faster but it is not mentioned how much faster, for example in the number of seconds. From the guide: Set the Passive link state to " Auto ". Auto setting will bring the interfaces on the passive firewall to UP physical state, the interface will not pass any data traffic. This facilitates faster failover times. Does anyone have an idea how much faster it becomes by changing the link state from shutdown to auto? Many thanks in advance.
... View more
04-07-2022
03:23 AM
Hi guys, We have a firewall that shows the free SWAP memory 0. Is this normal? It is a new installation and Genindex process seems to be normal. Here is the output of "show system resources": admin@PA-450> show system resources
top - 09:49:41 up 21 days, 20:55, 1 user, load average: 1.96, 2.03, 2.07
Tasks: 238 total, 1 running, 165 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie
%Cpu(s): 11.9 us, 10.4 sy, 2.2 ni, 74.8 id, 0.0 wa, 0.7 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem : 16269716 total, 925460 free, 5240044 used, 10104212 buff/cache
KiB Swap: 1020 total, 0 free, 1020 used. 6868148 avail Mem
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
5937 20 0 1789300 385796 38960 S 25.0 2.4 118:03.32 configd
3564 0 -20 3848148 3.4g 3.3g S 18.8 21.7 93:13.92 masterd_ap+
7148 20 0 131.6g 3.3g 3.3g S 18.8 21.4 4648:05 pan_task
24419 20 0 156148 20156 10672 S 18.8 0.1 0:00.09 masterd_ba+
7150 20 0 131.6g 3.3g 3.3g S 12.5 21.4 1587:13 pan_task
3582 15 -5 173524 13904 7920 S 6.2 0.1 72:14.64 sysd
6235 20 0 716664 101468 32564 S 6.2 0.6 161:27.25 dnsproxyd
5162 20 0 1183668 36384 26768 S 0.0 0.2 4:35.71 sysdagent
5167 30 10 142456 22560 8628 S 0.0 0.1 1:51.01 core_gdb
5179 20 0 7144 1796 1648 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 mcelog
5318 20 0 630396 32664 25408 S 0.0 0.2 3:25.44 chasd
5323 20 0 602820 73484 30784 S 0.0 0.5 2:33.35 dagger
5327 30 10 335308 32284 11456 S 0.0 0.2 58:14.72 python
5331 20 0 545184 34644 27076 S 0.0 0.2 96:41.78 contentd
5358 20 0 328820 9468 8112 S 0.0 0.1 1:36.91 plugin_api+
5449 10 -10 128.6g 14112 11328 S 0.0 0.1 235:50.39 brdagent
5774 20 0 97356 9036 7768 S 0.0 0.1 2:59.44 ehmon
5891 20 0 707300 39724 28892 S 0.0 0.2 2:53.88 cryptod
5915 20 0 38188 5196 4716 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 sshd
5930 20 0 1870336 553008 151900 S 0.0 3.4 63:22.54 devsrvr
5945 20 0 477692 68176 31132 S 0.0 0.4 125:47.07 distributo+
5948 20 0 521600 89120 31316 S 0.0 0.5 28:26.67 iotd
5950 20 0 1045776 207192 35860 S 0.0 1.3 25:53.63 reportd
5952 20 0 741968 215668 145800 S 0.0 1.3 224:46.63 useridd
6024 20 0 602052 142424 31840 S 0.0 0.9 11:34.05 mgmtsrvr
6048 nobody 20 0 50280 4008 3020 S 0.0 0.0 27:15.12 redis-serv+
6073 nobody 20 0 52840 4348 3148 S 0.0 0.0 100:16.26 redis-serv+
6101 nobody 20 0 50280 4164 3076 S 0.0 0.0 26:05.48 redis-serv+
6142 nobody 20 0 574108 50868 36036 S 0.0 0.3 2:21.95 httpd
6145 20 0 1175176 66648 8632 S 0.0 0.4 95:27.58 identitycl+
6171 20 0 1001624 16620 5216 S 0.0 0.1 59:57.53 dsclient
6210 20 0 650968 41692 30364 S 0.0 0.3 3:23.76 ikemgr
6213 20 0 1697164 312584 49328 S 0.0 1.9 2155:52 logrcvr
6215 20 0 812372 37840 27892 S 0.0 0.2 2:39.18 rasmgr
6216 20 0 653392 36004 26632 S 0.0 0.2 3:11.46 keymgr
6218 20 0 278428 34340 26716 S 0.0 0.2 1:41.94 pan_ifmgr
6219 20 0 2711508 98396 32008 S 0.0 0.6 13:35.15 varrcvr
6223 17 -3 560940 35568 27396 S 0.0 0.2 10:59.88 l2ctrld
6224 17 -3 280116 34952 26472 S 0.0 0.2 2:36.77 ha_agent
6225 20 0 538356 49188 29860 S 0.0 0.3 4:28.46 satd
6231 20 0 1093900 43776 29972 S 0.0 0.3 3:33.18 sslmgr
6234 20 0 557208 34688 27012 S 0.0 0.2 2:51.82 pan_dhcpd
6238 20 0 488312 35340 26816 S 0.0 0.2 2:14.85 pppoed
6240 17 -3 979544 57424 30656 S 0.0 0.4 7:10.50 routed
6241 20 0 471164 56576 34884 S 0.0 0.3 20:56.38 authd
7143 20 0 131.5g 3.3g 3.3g S 0.0 21.4 6:57.56 sdwand
7144 20 0 131.4g 3.3g 3.3g S 0.0 21.4 38:53.51 pan_dha
7145 20 0 131.4g 3.3g 3.3g S 0.0 21.4 7:10.32 mprelay
7146 20 0 132.5g 3.5g 3.3g S 0.0 22.7 63:32.92 pan_comm
7147 20 0 131.5g 3.3g 3.3g S 0.0 21.4 21:59.79 tund
7152 20 0 263764 49484 5092 S 0.0 0.3 38:43.76 wifclient
7160 30 10 163000 26704 11144 S 0.0 0.2 11:47.02 python
... View more
01-07-2022
04:50 AM
Hi BPry, Thanks for your reply. Ports are not reserved and after I extended the allocated port range, the source ports of the applications fall within the allocated range, however, the same result. Moreover, the user didn't hit the maximum allocation port limit. I am not sure this is the issue but if the user allocation port range is from 20000 to 20199, those applications are using source ports like 44xxx. Is there any way we can force applications to use only the ports allocated to the users and not whatever port they want? Thank you in advance.
... View more
01-06-2022
06:27 AM
1 Kudo
Hi guys, We faced an issue where users' traffic related to office applications from a system, on which Terminal Server is installed, gets dropped by the firewall due to the unknown source user. We are using Terminal Server Agent as the means of user identifications. Web browsing and traffic related to other applications pass through the firewall with no issue and of course, the source user is known for those traffics. At first, the source ports being used by those office applications were out of range of allocated ports on the TS, so we extended the range to the maximum value to no avail. Does anyone have an idea? Thank you in advance.
... View more
01-20-2021
01:32 AM
Hi team, Does anyone know if it is possible to assign and use an IPv6 address that starts with FE80:: to an interface? (For example FE80::1/64) We can assign with no errors but the IP address is not pingable. Thank you in advance.
... View more
12-09-2020
06:48 AM
1 Kudo
Hi team, Does anybody know if there is any compatibility issue between Palo Alto and Aruba Clearpass for changing users' passwords? When we use Microsoft NPS, GlobalProtect users will be prompted for changing their passwords when the passwords are expired. However, when we use Aruba Clearpass instead of Microsoft NPS it doesn't work. The only workaround we have found is to use Clearpass in Proxy mode. Thanks in advance.
... View more
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
07-01-2022
01:09 PM
|
Latest Tags
No tags yet
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2022 - Palo Alto Networks