This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Get Started
- News & Events
- Collaboration
- Education Services
- Technologies
- Next-Generation Firewall
- GlobalProtect
- Threat Prevention Services
- Endpoint Protection
- SSL Decryption
- App-ID
- Content-ID
- User-ID
- 5G
- IoT Security
- Cloud Identity Engine
- Panorama
- AIOps for NGFW
Network Security
- Prisma Access
- Prisma Cloud
- Prisma SD-WAN
- Cloud NGFW for AWS
- CN-Series
- VM-Series:
- Private Cloud
- OCI
- Alibaba
- AWS
- GCP
- Azure
Cloud Security
- Cortex XDR
- Cortex XSOAR
- Cortex Data Lake
- Cortex Xpanse
Security Operations
- Resources
About ShaunaYelverton
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- LIVEcommunity
- About ShaunaYelverton
07-13-2021
3Posts
0Likes
0Solutions
Jul 13, 2021Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by ShaunaYelverton
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1528 | 03-06-2020 05:37 AM | |
| 1536 | 03-06-2020 05:13 AM | |
| 1590 | 03-05-2020 10:52 AM |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 01-10-2020 11:23 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 07-13-2021 05:27 PM |
| Posts | 3 |
03-06-2020
05:37 AM
We are running 9.0.5, it was a misconfiguration of the tunnel between the Sonicwalls and Palo. They stayed up for over a week though. Thanks for the update.
... View more
03-06-2020
05:13 AM
In case anyone else is configuring PAN to Sonicwall this is how we configured. The tunnel interfaces were significantly slower and did not re-establish communication. https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/API-Articles/Create-a-VPN-from-Palo-Alto-to-Sonicwall/ta-p/55309
... View more
03-05-2020
10:52 AM
We had an incident where we have site to site VPNs coming into the Palo. The connection dropped and they would not come backup, even after dropping the VPN on both devices. The end result was a reboot of the firewall and it came back up. What I saw in the logs is pasted below. Customer support just said "As we can see from the Ike manager logs the firewall is receiving the first packet for IKE negotiation which accepts and sends the response but its not getting the reply." Both sides could ping each other. Ideas? ************ ====> PHASE-1 NEGOTIATION FAILED AS RESPONDER, MAIN MODE <==== ====> Failed SA: [500] cookie:b54ae8b7fae36f5b:a2a373bfed2ef054 <==== Due to timeout. [7m2020-03-05[27m 04:23:39.000 -0600 [INFO]: { 4: }: ====> PHASE-1 SA DELETED <==== ====> Deleted SA: [500] cookie:b54ae8b7fae36f5b:a2a373bfed2ef054 <==== [7m2020-03-05[27m 04:23:42.974 -0600 [PNTF]: { 4: }: ====> PHASE-1 NEGOTIATION STARTED AS RESPONDER, MAIN MODE <==== ====> Initiated SA: 4[500] cookie:1589d0bc1ca8cedd:b61975bbe41105ad <==== [7m2020-03-05[27m 04:23:42.975 -0600 [INFO]: { 4: }: received Vendor ID: RFC 3947 [7m2020-03-05[27m 04:23:42.975 -0600 [INFO]: { 4: }: received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-03 [7m2020-03-05[27m 04:23:42.975 -0600 [INFO]: { 4: }: received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02 [7m2020-03-05[27m 04:23:42.975 -0600 [INFO]: { 4: }: received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-00 [7m2020-03-05[27m 04:23:42.975 -0600 [INFO]: { 4: }: Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947 [7m2020-03-05[27m 04:23:50.974 -0600 [INFO]: the packet is retransmitted from [500].
... View more
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2022 - Palo Alto Networks