Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Live
- ›
- About Mohammed_Yasin
About Mohammed_Yasin
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
14 hours ago
In the data center end, the Cisco ASA firewall is advertising the OSPF route and at the perimeter end Palo alto receives the route, and PA will be forward that route toward Internet communication. Expectation, if any, specific route received by Palo alto, it should be rejected or drop on Palo alto itself. Should not forward to any next hop. How we can achieve in Palo Alto Firewall.
... View more
3 weeks ago
I have installed a Trap agent and certificate in Red Hat 6 successfully. But when I try to pull a Trap log. The error message occurs, ERROR: 14090086: SSL routines: SSL 3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE: certificate verify failed What could be for this error coming.
... View more
3 weeks ago
Certificate issue while installing the Trap agent on Red Hat 6. I mean, while communicating the of agents between Palo Alto Trap and Linux Red Hat 6 a error massage is Error HTTP Request failed due to an ssl error ssl exception error certificate verify failed.
... View more
4 weeks ago
See article below for more details https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000Clk7CAC In case unspecified of source IP, then the management interface IP will act as a default IP
... View more
4 weeks ago
Let me brief, the Unnecessary traffic over management interface, In Perimeter PA 5020 In Data Center Cisco ASA 5xxx In the Cisco firewall logs, the traffic sources are PA Management IP and Destination is Cisco management IP and attempt on port 135. Attachment of logs
... View more
4 weeks ago
Management interface generating unnecessary traffic on WMI Port... what could be reason?? Appliance: PA-5020 PAN-OS:8.1.11
... View more
03-03-2020
04:18 AM
An error while installing the Palo Alto Traps. The Error: - This installation package is not supported by this processor type, contact your product vendor. As per Palo alto Traps, Support Intel & AMD processor only and I have Processor Microsoft SQ1 @3. 0 GHz, 3.0 GHz How I can install Traps on Mircosoft processor or any other alternative to install the Traps for this kind of processor. Following details of the system for Traps need to install Model: Windows Surface Pro X - SQ1/8/256 M1501 Processor: Microsoft SQ1 @3.0 GHz 3.0 GHz Operating System: Windows 10 Enterprise (64 Bit) As I have multiple Surface pro X endpoints and they need to protect it with traps, the roadmap will be convincing to me at this point in time.
... View more
03-03-2020
04:10 AM
Following details of system for Traps need to install Model: Windows Surface Pro X - SQ1/8/256 M1501 Processor: Microsoft SQ1 @3.0 GHz 3.0 GHz Operating System: Windows 10 Enterprise (64 Bit)
... View more
03-03-2020
02:03 AM
An error while installing the Palo Alto Traps. The error This installation package is not supported by this processor type, contact your product vendor. As per Palo alto Traps, Agent will support Intel and AMD processor only and I have Processor Microsoft SQ1 @3. 0 GHz, 3.0 GHz How I can install Traps on Mircosoft processor or any other alternative to install the Traps for this kind of processor.
... View more
02-13-2020
01:27 AM
Hello Community, I have Panorama M-500 that managed cluster of PA-5000 with some Virtual System, I use one Device Group for one VSYS. Now I need to configure the Shared Gateway. It seems that I can manage the NAT Policy related to the Shared Group only into CLI of Panorama and not from Panorama GUI Could you confirm me I cannot managed it via Panorama?
... View more
02-05-2020
10:50 PM
Upgrade the Customer device from 7.1.25 to 8.1.12 and after the upgrade, we are facing issues with Dataplane Crash. Attached is the error message. Below bug matches the error. We have also tried to downgrade the Firmware to 8.1.10 and the issue still persists. https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000PMSyCAO Device was having some HA related configuration earlier which we removed before downgrading to 8.1.10. Earlier the device was in HA and upgrade was performed to 8.1.12. So in order to isolate the issue, HA settings were disabled before downgrading to 8.1.10 from 8.1.12 and the issue still persists. HA was enabled for future use but we disabled while downgrading the firmware to 8.1.10 please address this incident.
... View more
10 hours ago
12Posts
0Likes
0Solutions
Apr 06, 2020Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by Mohammed_Yasin
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 56 | 14 hours ago | |
| 169 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 185 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 159 | 4 weeks ago | |
| 234 | 4 weeks ago |
User Badges
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 01-21-2020 03:30 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 10 hours ago |
| Total Messages Posted | 12 |
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
10 hours ago
|
Latest Tags
No tags yet
Latest Blogs
Latest Posts
Copyright 2007 - 2020 - Palo Alto Networks
