This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About Helmut_Wenzel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About Helmut_Wenzel
06-22-2022
2Posts
0Likes
1Solution
Jun 22, 2022Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by Helmut_Wenzel
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3200 | 09-22-2020 11:58 PM | |
| 3275 | 09-22-2020 06:40 AM |
Posts I Liked
| Subject | Likes | Author | Latest Post |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Like |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 09-22-2020 06:30 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 06-22-2022 03:46 AM |
| Posts | 2 |
09-22-2020
11:58 PM
Hello and thanks for your answer. You have put me in the right direction. Luckily we don't use the 192.168.0.0/24 range in our /16 subnet. So I was able to solve the problem via NAT and route without another Linux VM. But for the solution I needed another virtual router. I can' t bind the 192.168.99.1 interface to the default router because its subnet is already bound to the 192.168.100.15/16 interface. The following picture should explain my solution: Thanks a lot!
... View more
09-22-2020
06:40 AM
Hello, I want to replace our existing firewall with a PA-850. Thereby I have a problem, which I cannot get solved. I have to route to an external network, which unfortunately uses the same subnet as ours. Until now, I have used a small Linux VM, which uses DNAT to convert the addresses. In principle the PA-850 should be able to do this with another virtual router and NAT rules. At least I hope so. But I do not know exactly how to implement this. The attached image should explain the problem: With kind regards
... View more
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks