This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About a.cadarso
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About a.cadarso
10-24-2016
9Posts
0Likes
0Solutions
Oct 24, 2016Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by a.cadarso
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1650 | 11-23-2010 09:28 AM | |
| 1720 | 09-07-2010 04:25 AM | |
| 1668 | 07-28-2010 09:34 AM | |
| 2413 | 06-30-2010 01:10 AM | |
| 2807 | 06-29-2010 03:48 AM |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 12-11-2009 10:16 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 10-24-2016 07:28 AM |
| Posts | 9 |
11-23-2010
09:28 AM
Hi, my scenario is: one Security Rule that allow one IP of inside (10.10.10.1) to outside with ftp application. I've captured traffic and I see that the three way handshake begins but when Palo Alto detects that the traffic is not ftp, it doesn't send RST to the client, simply doesn't respond. This is a problem if the client application has high timeout. Is this the way Palo Alto works?? Is there any way to change this behavior in order to Palo Alto sends a RST to client in this situation?.. Thank you in advance. Samuel
... View more
09-07-2010
04:25 AM
Hi, our Palo Alto has detected the threat: Name: Trojan/Win32.dropper.bxzq ID: 2723653 Description: This signature detected Trojan/Win32.dropper.bxzq Severity: But if I try to find this threath by name or ID in Threat Database it doesn't exist, how is it possible? At the same time the Palo Alto has detected MAIL: User Login Brute-force Attempt ID: 40007 Description: This event indicates that someone is using a brute force attack to gain access to mail server through smtp/pop3/imap authentication request. Severity: But in Threat Reports, vulnerability it doesn't exist even though in Logs, Threat it appears like "vulnerability". Could you explain this?? Thank you in advance Samuel
... View more
- Tags:
- threat
07-28-2010
09:34 AM
Hi, is it normal that in passive unit of high availability the link leds of interfaces are switch off?. the high availability it's ok and synchronized. I don't find anything about that in documentation. Thank you Samuel
... View more
06-30-2010
01:10 AM
Thank you Stephen. Is there any older release where this bug doesn't exists? Best regards Samuel
... View more
06-29-2010
03:48 AM
Hi, could I use SSL-Decrypt wiht FTP-SSL (no secure ftp). It seems doesn't work, if you put "decrypt" in SSl-Decryption the ftp connection begin but it stops and never shows the palo Alto certificate. I've put "any" in category column but I've tested with unknown too. Could it be that the SSL-Decryption doesn't work if the destination is not a URL?. With no-decrypt the SSL-FTP works fine. Thank you in advance Samuel
... View more
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
10-24-2016
07:28 AM
|
Latest Tags
No tags yet
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks