This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Get Started
- News & Events
- Collaboration
- Education Services
- Technologies
- Next-Generation Firewall
- GlobalProtect
- Threat Prevention Services
- Endpoint Protection
- SSL Decryption
- App-ID
- Content-ID
- User-ID
- 5G
- IoT Security
- Cloud Identity Engine
- Panorama
- AIOps for NGFW
Network Security
- Prisma Access
- Prisma Cloud
- Prisma SD-WAN
- Cloud NGFW for AWS
- CN-Series
- VM-Series:
- Private Cloud
- OCI
- Alibaba
- AWS
- GCP
- Azure
Cloud Security
- Cortex XDR
- Cortex XSOAR
- Cortex Data Lake
- Cortex Xpanse
Security Operations
- Resources
About MistryJa
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- LIVEcommunity
- About MistryJa
9Posts
0Likes
0Solutions
Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by MistryJa
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 228 | 05-17-2022 02:41 PM | |
| 270 | 05-17-2022 01:42 PM | |
| 350 | 05-04-2022 11:14 AM | |
| 646 | 04-01-2022 08:46 PM | |
| 717 | 03-31-2022 06:37 AM |
Posts I Liked
| Subject | Likes | Author | Latest Post |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Like | |||
| 1 Like |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 02-18-2021 08:24 AM |
| Date Last Visited | |
| Posts | 9 |
05-17-2022
02:41 PM
Yes correct, thanks for clarifying thought it may cause some asymmetric routing issues. So there is no need to add an explicit static route to forward traffic for 10.20.50.x out from 1/6? In terms of keeping lab traffic isolated is this in principle fine to use the /24 in the same ip range?
... View more
05-17-2022
01:42 PM
I just have a question about static routing on the palo alto and how it deals with traffic. We one VR and a default network route to send traffic for 10.20.0.0/16 out via ethernet 1/5 , zone core. There is another interface 1/6 configured with 10.20.50.1/24 zone lab. On the lan by default all traffic get sent to the firewall. Outbound traffic is going out to internet fine via zone lab. Is there likely to be any issues with this routing configuration ?
... View more
05-04-2022
11:14 AM
Since the Palo upgrade to 10.1.5 last week we have identified three issues, some being service impacting: • Slow searches and log pulls. • Traffic being incorrectly classified and some being dropped. • Menus not expanding.
... View more
04-01-2022
08:46 PM
Thank you for the update. We are using 5252. Are you getting any users complaining of external voice calls being dropped after a few seconds? It would be good to know if 10.1.5 resolves.
... View more
03-31-2022
06:37 AM
We upgraded to this version from 9.1.11 to 10.1.4-h4 on the 10th March '22 and its painfully slow......we also are not happy with new interface. Do you know if there is a fix ?
... View more
02-24-2021
09:54 PM
Hello Varun, Even if the static routing ensures that traffic gets routed directly to the firewall ? Regards,
... View more
02-24-2021
05:22 PM
Hi All, Just looking for advise , pros vs cons about connecting an ISP internet feed directly to our core mpls/vpls switch. ISP Internet Router—>adva—>Core Switch(siteA)—>mpls/vpls—>Core Switch(siteB)—> Palo Alto The PA firewall will have a separate VR and will nat traffic from 10.x LAN to Public before routing out to Internet via core. There is ospf routing on all cores and distribution switches connecting to cores as well as L2/L3 traffic from other sites. Is this acceptable and what are the security concerns?
... View more
02-18-2021
09:00 AM
Hi All, I have a guest wifi vlan 10.25.x.x that needs to be routed out to a second ISP. AP-->WLC--Palo Alto FW-->MPLS/VPLS-Router-->L3Switch-->ISP The vlan will each have a sub-interface and gateway 10.25.x.1 assigned on firewall in its own guest zone and virtual router. The virtual router will have a default gateway 0.0.0.0 to a next hop 10.25.x.2 layer 3 switch SVI where ISP is connected. Nat will be performed on the L3 switch, 10.25.x.x addresses pool to a public IP before routing out to internet. 1) Will the policy based forwarding work ? 2) I assume I can forward the same traffic out the same sub-interfaces ? 3) Also if I performed the NAT on the Palo Alto before routing out to ISP over a private network is that acceptable from security point of view ?
... View more
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2022 - Palo Alto Networks