This website uses Cookies. Click Accept to agree to our website's cookie use as described in our Cookie Policy. Click Preferences to customize your cookie settings.
About Jorge_Pizarro
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About Jorge_Pizarro
02-07-2022
4Posts
0Likes
0Solutions
Feb 07, 2022Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by Jorge_Pizarro
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3141 | 07-12-2021 05:06 AM | |
| 3507 | 07-09-2021 01:40 PM | |
| 3527 | 07-09-2021 10:52 AM | |
| 3582 | 07-09-2021 09:03 AM |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 03-10-2021 06:42 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 02-07-2022 08:12 AM |
| Posts | 4 |
07-09-2021
01:40 PM
I was wondering if instead of creating 5 different FQDN objects abc1.def.com, abc2.def.com, abc3.def.com, abc4.def.com, abc5.def.com, I could create one to cover all 5 , abc*.def.com. So far I guess is not possible.
... View more
07-09-2021
10:52 AM
Hi JoergSchuetter
I tested this on 9.1 abc^.def.com , The value on this field is invalid , Cant use ^ on the FQDN. Any other suggestion. Thanks
... View more
07-09-2021
09:03 AM
Team , I have a question about something that I guess is not possible to configure but will like to confirm if possible . My client want to allow Internal NW 10.0.0.0/8 to FQDN abc1.def.com port HTTPS , this is normal and I have a few of this rules already implemented. Now the question is , is possible to create a FQDN for abc*.def.com?, a wildcard FQDN like abc*.edf.com could be created, it would cover all the individually numbered abc destinations or I will have to create individuals FQDNs for each abc*. . Thanks in advance
... View more
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
02-07-2022
08:12 AM
|
Latest Tags
No tags yet
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks