I think the issue with these sites is that they have such varying degrees of unsuitability. I've just checked the three URLs you mentioned and they were categorised as follows: [if only for the benefit of other readers if you have already checked them] chatrandom.com Internet Communications Adult and Pornography chatroulette.com Nudity Internet Communications omegle.com Social Network The first two are cleary more adult orientated and so I would have thought blocking "Adult and Poronography" along with "Nudity" would have been acceptable for many companies. I'm aware that sometimes more innocent sites can get caught up in the Nudity sites so you could ask BrightCloud, who Palo Alto use, to recategorise the URL. I've had a great experience with BrightCloud who have got back to me within 24hrs whenever I've suggested a change. With regards to Omegle, it's not clear that it's going to lead to anythin unsavoury. What's the difference between that site and say MSN Web Messenger or Google Chat, Facebook chat etc etc. Many harmless sites could be used to have adult chat on but they wouldn't be blocked unless it was the main use as is seen with the first couple of URLs you suggested. In terms of application blocking - they all use so many different types of technologies to operate so I'd think it would be tough to block them. For the sites you wish to block, what common attribute do they have that doesn't include harmless sites? And finally, if you don't want to block the adult categories, aren't you letting users access far worse sites? UKRB
... View more