Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Get Started
- News & Events
- Collaboration
- Education Services
- Technologies
- Next-Generation Firewall
- GlobalProtect
- Threat Prevention Services
- Endpoint Protection
- SSL Decryption
- 5G
- IoT Security
- Prisma SD-WAN
Network Security
- Prisma Access
- Prisma SaaS
- Prisma Cloud
- CN-Series
- VM-Series:
- Alibaba
- AWS
- GCP
- Azure
Cloud Security
- Cortex XDR
- Cortex XSOAR
- Cortex Data Lake
Security Operations
- Resources
- COVID-19 Response Center
About rthakker
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- LIVEcommunity
- About rthakker
a month ago
5Posts
0Likes
0Solutions
Apr 12, 2021Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by rthakker
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 179 | a month ago | |
| 300 | 04-09-2021 09:07 AM | |
| 336 | 04-09-2021 08:53 AM | |
| 369 | 04-09-2021 08:34 AM | |
| 421 | 04-09-2021 06:01 AM |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 04-09-2021 05:39 AM |
| Date Last Visited | a month ago |
| Posts | 5 |
a month ago
All, I have noticed when Destination NAT configured for IPs which aren't configured on Firewall packets are being dropped so /25(IPv4) and /40(IPv6). If I add subnet as a Loopback interrace on firewall then NAT works. I tried using static discard route (Null route) but its not solving the issue. I am guessing its proxy-arp issue or is it something else? Any other way to solve the issue?
... View more
04-09-2021
09:07 AM
I do have similar challenges due to migration work hence wanted to employ NAT as traffic is expected both ways between subnets hence NAT seems good option.
... View more
04-09-2021
08:53 AM
Thank you for the prompt reply. I will check your suggested solution. In the meantime please could you tell me if it possible to solve by NAT or its impractical?
... View more
04-09-2021
08:34 AM
Yes they are connected but part of Migration work and removing Overlapping addresses requires NAT.
... View more
04-09-2021
06:01 AM
Hi Everyone, I am struggling to solve a problem NAT issue and need some help. I need to configure May-to-Many NAT on Palo Alto Firewall between two data centers. I have three /25 IPv4 subnets which needs to be mapped to three /25 subnets (subnet to subnet basis if not one to one IP basis) and three IPv6 /40 subnets needs same treatment. Traffic is expected to come from both direction inside to outside and outside to inside on specified TCP, UDP and ICMP ports. I have PA3220 which has been upgraded to PAN OS 9.0 and I will applicate if you can suggest best way to achieve this? Do I need to consider any resource limitation as I have three /25 IPv4 and three /40 IPv6 subnets which can overwhelm the resource? Thanks RT
... View more
- Tags:
- Many-to-Many NAT
- nat
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
a month ago
|
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2021 - Palo Alto Networks
