This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About nboyer137
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About nboyer137
05-15-2018
6Posts
0Likes
0Solutions
May 15, 2018Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by nboyer137
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 15652 | 12-06-2017 02:23 PM | |
| 3544 | 04-14-2016 11:13 AM | |
| 3560 | 02-29-2016 07:07 AM | |
| 3780 | 02-26-2016 08:56 AM | |
| 3801 | 02-25-2016 07:32 AM | |
| 3887 | 02-25-2016 06:44 AM |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 04-26-2013 06:36 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 05-15-2018 01:34 PM |
| Posts | 6 |
04-14-2016
11:13 AM
I've finally tested for this, it does not issue a gratuitous arp out of the wan interfaces of all the VSYS's. When issuing the 'test arp gratuitous' command to force the firewall to send out an arp packet, there is no evidence that the firewall had sent out an arp packet from the wan interfaces. I did this both before the upgrade (which I can see the gratuitous arp) and after upgrade (no gratuitous arp). Any more ideas folks? -Norm
... View more
02-29-2016
07:07 AM
Hello, thank you for the response. That was the upgrade path recommended by Palo Alto tech support. I plan on trying a different software version instead, going from 6.0.8 --> 6.1.0 --> 6.1.8. I was told 6.1.7 or 6.1.8 is the most stable in the 6.1.x train. We'll see if that fixes the problem.
... View more
02-26-2016
08:56 AM
Thank you Pankaj. Our organization is not using any NAT policies as we are not using RFC1918 addresses. Everything is public. This issue has truly puzzled me. At this point, I am wondering if it could be a PANOS compatibility issue with our PA4050's? -Norm
... View more
02-25-2016
07:32 AM
Hello Pankaj. No, the CIDR prefix is /27. Thanks. -Norm
... View more
02-25-2016
06:44 AM
Hello folks, need some help here. After upgrading from 6.0.8 --> 6.1.0 --> 6.1.2, the WAN interface of the upgraded device, part of an HA-Pair in active-passive mode, does not register its MAC address with an upstream directly connected L2 switch. If I fail back over to the non-upgraded device, passing of traffic resumes as normal and the WAN interface is registered in the mac-address table of the switch. Fail back over to the upgraded device and the MAC address drops from the mac-address table. Roll back the upgraded device to the original software version (6.0.8) and everything works again in the HA pair. Has anyone experienced this and what was done to overcome this issue. Appreciate any input. -Norm
... View more
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
05-15-2018
01:34 PM
|
Latest Tags
No tags yet
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks