This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About PA_User
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About PA_User
10-15-2021
2Posts
0Likes
0Solutions
Oct 15, 2021Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by PA_User
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1107 | 10-15-2021 12:04 PM | |
| 1164 | 10-15-2021 07:34 AM |
Posts I Liked
| Subject | Likes | Author | Latest Post |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Like |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 10-15-2021 07:28 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 10-15-2021 03:25 PM |
| Posts | 2 |
10-15-2021
07:34 AM
Hello Palo Alto Community, I have a question regarding moving https traffic off a rule to another existing rule. The traffic being moved is critical to operations and cannot be disrupted. For this reason I've been asked to confirm the behaviour of this change. I don't see any issues with proceeding however would like to confirm the impact. My thoughts are the following when implementing the change: -Established traffic sessions would continue to work based on the connection table until closed. So any traffic that was initially permitted by the first rule will continue to be allowed. Any subsequent new connections would be permitted via the other existing rule going forward. Does this sound about right? Thanks in advance.
... View more
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks