This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About mmccorkle5
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About mmccorkle5
12-21-2022
2Posts
2Likes
0Solutions
Dec 21, 2022Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by mmccorkle5
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 282 | 12-21-2022 07:39 AM | |
| 364 | 12-21-2022 07:36 AM |
My Liked Posts
| Subject | Likes | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Likes | 12-21-2022 07:36 AM |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 01-07-2022 01:01 PM |
| Date Last Visited | 12-21-2022 12:16 PM |
| Posts | 2 |
| Total Likes Received | 2 |
12-21-2022
07:39 AM
Am I missing something, or is 9.1.x Pan-OS still unable to search for address objects by IP address when editing policies?
Surely there is a way to do this... our workaround was to simply rename every object to be 'name - IP'.. but we have 4000+ objects and this is a ton of clicking/modifying.
Any thoughts?
Thanks in advance!
... View more
12-21-2022
07:36 AM
2 Kudos
In case anyone is stumbling upon this thread in 2022... the suggested method above doesn't seem to work effectively or consistently. Running 9.1.x and our Panorama seems to stop checking after it reaches X errors or objects. I had to go back and select chunks of around 75 or less for it to effectively get rid of unused objects. This is rough when you have 4000+ objects... Is Palo is ever going to give us a feature to simply remove unused objects in bulk without having to use Expedition?
... View more
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
12-21-2022
12:16 PM
|
Latest Tags
No tags yet
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks