This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About Amnuay
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About Amnuay
08-18-2015
8Posts
1Like
1Solution
Aug 18, 2015Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by Amnuay
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 8363 | 01-16-2014 07:19 PM | |
| 8257 | 01-14-2014 02:30 AM | |
| 8257 | 01-13-2014 03:03 AM | |
| 8488 | 01-12-2014 06:44 PM | |
| 4979 | 09-16-2013 01:19 AM | |
| 6127 | 08-15-2013 10:02 PM | |
| 6452 | 08-13-2013 03:52 AM | |
| 6823 | 07-25-2013 05:15 AM |
My Liked Posts
| Subject | Likes | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Like | 07-25-2013 05:15 AM |
Posts I Liked
| Subject | Likes | Author | Latest Post |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Like |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 06-18-2013 02:13 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 08-18-2015 09:07 AM |
| Posts | 8 |
| Total Likes Received | 1 |
01-16-2014
07:19 PM
Hi HULK, Thank you for your help. I'm now able to solve this. It was compatibility issue. I've discovered that on Juniper stated SHA2-256 but on PAN stated sha256 -> I expect this give the same result but not. So fallback to SHA1 is my solution to this event. More fix for PAN -> I expect better error message not just "likely" LoL ^^ to HULK Thank a lot. AM
... View more
09-16-2013
06:13 AM
To answer you question, configure a NAT policy to NAT traffic on port 4500 for the VPN traffic. As mentioned earlier, you have to configure NAT traversal on both the end routers
... View more
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks