Attention: The LIVEcommunity is experiencing an interruption with videos in some areas. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Thank you for your patience as we work towards a solution to restore videos.
@BPry thanks for your information. What we had in mind was to have an overarching Panorama just for centrally monitoring all the VM-300 pairs and to provision content updates etc. But majority of the policy provisioning would be done by the users locally on the VM-300. In this scenario, hopefully we get a single pane of glass of seeing what traffic is passing through the VM-300 while allowing users to manage their own policies locally.
... View more
Hi Palo Alto Community I wanted to ask what are the pro's and cons of not using a Panorama for managing a single pair of VM-300 firewalls. From reading documentations etc, the main benefit of Panorama would only be if this was a distrbuted deployment managing 10's or 100's of firewalls. If in this case it was only 2 VM's to be managed a Panorama would not serve any benefits from what I gather. But wanted to open up to the community to see if I will lose out on any features by not using the Panorama. We would like to use the API and code directly the VM-300 for provisioning policies etc. Thanks for any advice on this.
... View more