This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
About dynamicv
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- LIVEcommunity
- About dynamicv
07-12-2022
4Posts
2Likes
0Solutions
Jul 12, 2022Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by dynamicv
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2047 | 07-22-2016 03:42 AM | |
| 15635 | 03-25-2016 07:30 AM | |
| 2126 | 09-25-2014 07:46 AM | |
| 1307 | 08-30-2013 04:03 AM |
My Liked Posts
| Subject | Likes | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Like | 07-22-2016 03:42 AM | |
| 1 Like | 03-25-2016 07:30 AM |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 03-22-2012 05:46 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 07-12-2022 08:15 PM |
| Posts | 4 |
| Total Likes Received | 2 |
07-22-2016
03:42 AM
1 Kudo
It's now three years later and this functionality is still missing. Is Palo Alto ever going to fix these log term issues and requests?
... View more
03-25-2016
07:30 AM
1 Kudo
Glad to see this one has a definite answer. Was seriously worried we were being DDOSd in some nasty way that the gateways weren't picking up on 😕
Panorama M100s in HA here - once again no issues on gateways, just the Panorama box logd service causing constant restarts.
... View more
09-25-2014
07:46 AM
Default Action on the signature is set to alert, which is very strange for something that could potentially be used to create DHCP worms across virtually every non-Windows platform, including smartphones. We've installed the update onto all our PANOS boxes, but cannot see ID 36729 nor the CVE number appear in the signatures list. Regardless of that, if I create a rule to match the 36729 ID with block as the action will the device take it?
... View more
08-30-2013
04:03 AM
OK, so this is driving me mad and I'm obviously missing something. I've created a custom URL category in which I wish to drop URLs that will bypass SSL decryption. In this I want to use wildcards, so that all sites for a particular company can be bypassed. For the sake of example, let's say the site I want to get to unencrypted is https://www.microsoft.com In the URL category I've added *.microsoft.com using the wildcard EXACTLY as documented in the URL_Categorzation_PANOS-RevC.pdf document posted on this site. The custom URL category is then referenced in a rule in my Decryption policy, with action no-decrypt and type ssl-forward-proxy set appropriately Everything has then been committed back to the PANOS firewall. Result? URLs matching the wildcard are still being decrypted. The firewall is completely ignoring the bypass rule. Anyone got any idea why? The CLI "Test" command doesn't even recognise my custom URL categories, so that's no help. Firewall is running 5.0.5 Thanks in advance
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Configuration
-
Content-ID
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
07-12-2022
08:15 PM
|
Latest Tags
No tags yet
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2022 - Palo Alto Networks