This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About CRT-Capital
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About CRT-Capital
11-25-2020
3Posts
0Likes
0Solutions
Nov 25, 2020Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by CRT-Capital
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3184 | 04-10-2013 03:26 PM | |
| 2229 | 02-12-2013 02:02 PM | |
| 2528 | 02-10-2013 11:18 AM |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 03-28-2012 10:21 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 11-25-2020 03:10 PM |
| Posts | 3 |
04-10-2013
03:26 PM
Running into the same issue on 4.1.10. Any update?
... View more
02-12-2013
02:02 PM
I'm running 4.1.10 and the cosmetic bug still exists.
... View more
02-10-2013
11:18 AM
I'm running 4.1.10. In order for the PAN to accept client connections (I'm binding the portal to the "outside" interface) I had to create a security rule - "outside zone to outside zone, destination the external interface of the PAN, apps - SSL, web browsing, and panos-global-protect, services http (80) and https (433)." Without this rule clients were not able to connect. BUT this has to do with the fact that I have an explicit deny rule at the bottom of my policy for logging purposes. So, in my case I need to create explicit zone to zone rules (I didn't recreate the hidden same zone to same zone allow rule - this is by design).
... View more
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
11-25-2020
03:10 PM
|
Latest Tags
No tags yet
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks