Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Live
- ›
- About tommyluke
About tommyluke
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
08-18-2015
13Posts
0Likes
0Solutions
Aug 18, 2015Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by tommyluke
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 637 | 06-25-2014 10:04 AM | |
| 739 | 10-16-2013 12:26 PM | |
| 739 | 10-16-2013 11:48 AM | |
| 439 | 09-26-2013 02:13 PM | |
| 502 | 09-26-2013 01:05 PM |
Posts I Liked
| Subject | Likes | Author | Latest Post |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | |||
| 1 | |||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 1 |
User Badges
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 05-25-2012 09:59 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 08-18-2015 09:07 AM |
| Total Messages Posted | 13 |
06-25-2014
10:04 AM
I'm unable to determine from the tech-docs if PAN has a recommended (or suggested) cable length for those cases where the HA ports are directly connected via crossover cable. Does anyone have any intel on this topic? I've set-up many HA pairs and when using directly-connected HA ports via crossover I typically use a 6' cable. I'm working at a place that uses 1' crossover cables for other out-of-band communications and their standard would dictatate that I use "their" cables on the firewalls. This is probably an old Check Point ghost of mine but "back then" the crossover cables between firewalls were to be at least 3'. Any insight would be appreciated, thank you. Tommy
... View more
10-16-2013
12:26 PM
Phoenix That makes sense, thank you. However, a person would be required to perform the export on each and every device/appliance that one manages, correct?
... View more
10-16-2013
11:48 AM
Chatri and Phoenix have some good suggestions. However, I'm also curious about this but want a more 'global' perspective - like gwhyte mentioned - with Panorama and multiple firewalls, etc. The root objective for me, then, is to find a way to search all shared *and* local objects from one place! I'm not sure if this is possible but I'd like to hear from the PAN warriors out there...
... View more
09-26-2013
02:13 PM
Thank you kadak. You are correct, I have agentless userid configured. I imagine that, were I to disable client probing, the msrpc data from the management ip would cease. When you stat that we need to "make sure that we disabled client probing" is that because you have experienced problems with client probing? best, tommy
... View more
09-26-2013
01:05 PM
the mgmt interface on a 3050 is reaching out to a number of internal host over msrpc (tcp/135). i've not been successful in discoving the purpose of this via the admin guide - is anyone else seeing this behavior? thx, tommyluke
... View more
- Tags:
- management_interface
09-12-2013
02:16 PM
An upgrade from Panorama 5.1.0 to 5.1.2 appears to have resolved the issue, I've been working in Panorama all day without this occurrence. mr.linus Chatri
... View more
09-12-2013
05:58 AM
Chatri, thank you for the reply. I'm using Chrome v. 29.0.1547.66 m. I've tried with other browsers and have not seen the issue, however, I used Chrome with Panorama *a lot* and the others browsers for a brief test so I feel that the results are not formative. We're updating Panorama to 5.1.2 to see if that will resolve the oddity.
... View more
09-12-2013
05:56 AM
mr. linus, thank you for mentioning your past GUI issues; we're updating to 5.1.2 now and I'll test and reply once again.
... View more
09-11-2013
01:46 PM
Problem statement: The Panorama 'context' drop-down disappears. We're then stuck in whatever context we were last in. Occurrence: Too many times (8 times in the last 1/2 day) Work around: Close/open Chrome, reconnect to Panorama. Contextual info: We use Panorama v 5.1.0. Our various firewalls (managed devices) are at 5.0.5. We use Chrome browsers to interface with Panorama. Question: have you experienced this? do you have a fix? Thanks, tommy
... View more
09-09-2013
03:13 PM
NGS why do you prefer having a VWIRE deployment not track state? I ask because we typically deploy L3 and I'm getting ready to deploy a complex (IMO) VWIRE pair of 3050s. thx, Tommy Adams
... View more
01-16-2013
10:19 AM
Thank you Numan, that is helpful. Do you have a source (perhaps I missed this topic in some PAN documentation?) for your understanding? That makes sense and I imagine you're correct; I'm looking for something in black & white to confirm, if possible. I sure do appreciate the helpful response, thank you.
... View more
01-16-2013
09:25 AM
Dear PAN community, When a new 'Applications and Threats' signature is release there are typically two versions that have the same Version name (e.g. 350-1658) but then differ in the File Name and Features description. As a current example, Applications and Threats Version 350-1658 was released on 2013/01/15 and there are two of them, one with File Name panupv2-all-apps-350-1658 and the other with File Name panupv2-all-contents-350-1658. The former is 16MB and the Feature column says 'apps', the latter is 17MB and the Feature column says 'contents'. I'd like to fully understand the purpose of each, apparently unique, release. Thank you in advance. Best, tommyluke
... View more
- Tags:
- dynamic_update
Labels:
12-19-2012
10:02 AM
+1 for jechaff's question: where is the updated UID agent best practice / design document? Our WAN links are suffering hard from the traffic to/from our PAN UID agent servers in our data centers and the remote domain controllers. It seems obvious after reading through these posts that the recommendation is to have a PAN UID agent server at each local site but I'd like to see some official documentation on the subject before we begin to deploy new vm servers everywhere.
... View more
Latest Blogs
Latest Posts
Copyright 2007 - 2020 - Palo Alto Networks
