This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About marsan
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About marsan
03-03-2021
1Post
0Likes
0Solutions
Mar 03, 2021Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by marsan
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3401 | 08-02-2010 02:36 PM |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 04-30-2010 04:28 PM |
| Date Last Visited | 03-03-2021 04:17 PM |
| Posts | 1 |
08-02-2010
02:36 PM
Hi all, We have a brand new 2050 that is going to be used to support a school district with about 5000 students.... so we expect, eventually, to have about 5000 to 6000 hosts going out to the internet. And we have access to a full class C public block. The question that I have is: should we set this PA2050 to use a NAT pool or would setting it as "one-to-many" (where I would use only one public IP number for all my outgoing traffic) will be enough. I would think that a pool makes more sense since it would eliminate the risk of having large amounts of traffic coming from the same IP number and therefore been tagged as spam.... but why would that matter if there would be 64K session coming from the same IP (Dynamic IP/Pool) before the next available IP gets used? Any feedback will be appreciated.
... View more
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
03-03-2021
04:17 PM
|
Latest Tags
No tags yet
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks