Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Live
- ›
- About Avanderheyden
About Avanderheyden
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Online
28Posts
2Likes
0Solutions
Dec 04, 2020Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by Avanderheyden
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 883 | 06-22-2020 02:03 AM | |
| 965 | 06-19-2020 04:53 AM | |
| 874 | 06-02-2020 08:33 AM | |
| 517 | 04-10-2020 05:29 AM | |
| 585 | 03-09-2020 02:54 PM |
My Liked Posts
| Subject | Likes | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 06-09-2016 12:56 AM |
User Badges
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 01-06-2016 06:00 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 4 hours ago |
| Total Messages Posted | 41 |
| Total Likes Received | 2 |
06-22-2020
02:03 AM
I'm not even sure how I would do that -I just imported the tar.gz as CP file within the migration tool. It did create a separate 'vsys' or template (expedition bottom right) for the application and FW/security layers. Within the FW/security layer these rules cannot be found. I can provide the source file in this specific case directly though if that would be prefered.
... View more
06-19-2020
04:53 AM
Hi,
I'm stumbeling upon an issue while importing a CP R80.30 configuration, exported with the github script. When I import the config in expedition (1.1.70), it only seems to import the parent rules for the in-line layers and not its members:
as you can see, there is a management section (5 rules) with no in-line layer. These rules get converted fine. For the other sections (outside, external dmz, internal dmz) the expedition tool only converts the "parent rule for ..." and nothing below them.
I extracted the obtained .tar.gz files and validated the info for these rules is there in separate HTML&JSON files. Am I missing something in the import process or is this a bug/feature request?
Kind regards
... View more
06-02-2020
08:33 AM
To avoid more people factory resetting due to loading the full config after setting IP's; whats the password for the admin user in the day1config? 🙂
... View more
04-10-2020
05:29 AM
Hi,
In a somewhat unusual case I'm trying to use objects pushed through Panorama, in a policy in expedition. Both Panorama and the firewall are linked & imported in the expedition project.
Moving the firewall policy to an all Panorama policy isn't an option here (yet). Is there a way I can use a Panorama object (already present on the firewall) and use it in local policies through expedition (or the find/replace functionality)?
... View more
03-09-2020
02:54 PM
Well the whole idea is to keep it transparant and not have users authenticate to anything. I do suppose that if I were to use cookies it wouldn't pick up users logging in or out, and on-demand is exactly what we're trying to avoid (with captive portals on top of the list :-)). The agent should be invisible to the end users, but if no one knows an alternative I'm guessing it will be support to confirm or a feature request...
... View more
03-04-2020
05:49 AM
I actually don't mind if it can't get to the portal, I just don't want users to see the message -so it's more, can I suppress the message on the client itself or not?
... View more
03-04-2020
05:05 AM
No, if possible we highly prefer not to have the portal externally available.
... View more
03-04-2020
04:40 AM
Internal host detection IPv4 is set to an internal on-prem IP and the hostname for it does not publicly resolve, plus internal gateways are configured..
... View more
03-04-2020
03:08 AM
Hi all, I've deployed a GlobalProtect installation solely for the purpose of User-ID. The GP agent connects to the internal portal/GW (one box) upon login with Kerberos SSO. However, when the internal gateway is not reachable (user has no network, user isn't on-prem), the GlobalProtect Agent notifies the user about this (no network / can't reach GW). Does anyone know how I can supress this warning?
... View more
06-12-2019
04:15 AM
I checked and the file is indeed incorrectly formatted to JSON standards, but after running the export again, and then again on a completly other R80.10 management server, I found those were also incorrectly formatted to the standards -and hence would be 'normal'... Are you willing to take a look at it? I know the feature is in beta though.
... View more
06-09-2019
08:45 AM
Hello,
Has anyone managed to get a R80.10 import completed based on the show package output?
I've got the import of the address objects/services/.. but only the global access policy layer seems to get imported. They are present if I look at the contents of the json/html files inside of the package though. If I try to import the .json rulebase using the R80 import tab it reads a syntax error, malformed JSON. Any known tricks to get the others imported as well?
... View more
- Tags:
- check point
- R80
- R80.10
10-10-2018
03:26 PM
Then AFAIK you need to base your project on the Panorama config (and import the panorama configuration), not the firewall configuration. The Panorama pushed policies are not present in the firewalls running-config.xml or candidate config either, so it's logical the expedition tool can't retrieve them either. Vice versa, you will push your changes using API calls to Panorama and from Panorama to the device.
... View more
10-10-2018
02:50 AM
HW platform, chassis, cloud platform? I just dumped in a relatively complex config in the Expedition tool and it read it fine here (v106)...
... View more
10-10-2018
02:43 AM
Have you gone, outside of a project, to devices -> choose your device -> contents -> "retrieve contents" & save first?
... View more
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Online
|
| Date Last Visited |
4 hours ago
|
Latest Blogs
Latest Posts
Copyright 2007 - 2020 - Palo Alto Networks
