Ran a very quick and dirty test with Wildfire using a few malicious files I could find online. 2 out of 8 of these were judged "benign" by Wildfire (the 2 that were missed were very similar, so 1 out of 7 may be more accurate). Anyway, I know that nothing like this is going to be perfect, so I'm not complaining about the false negatives. Questions: 1) Is it useful to feed false negatives back to you? If you want the samples, what is the best way to share them? 2) Are executables signed by a trusted CA completely whitelisted, or is that just one element used to score the file? 3) Any plans to include analysis of other file types such as jar or pdf? Thanks in advance! Michael
... View more