This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About TiborNad
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About TiborNad
01-07-2021
5Posts
0Likes
0Solutions
Jan 07, 2021Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by TiborNad
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 4333 | 08-23-2019 04:33 AM | |
| 4386 | 08-23-2019 12:16 AM | |
| 2149 | 04-20-2017 02:18 AM | |
| 1853 | 09-20-2016 01:19 AM | |
| 1859 | 09-20-2016 12:28 AM |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 09-20-2016 12:17 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 01-07-2021 12:07 PM |
| Posts | 5 |
08-23-2019
04:33 AM
Thank you very much. This is a interesting option I would never have considered. Your input is very much appreciated. Any other suggestions? Or can someone confirm my feeling that URL categories will not have any impact at all?
... View more
08-23-2019
12:16 AM
Dear community We are dealing with a request for a firewall rule which is supposed to allow SMB traffic (TCP 445) to a wildcard destination like *.subdomain.example.com out on the internet. So this made me think about how we should implement such a rule and I am not even sure it can be done or at least I don't know how. If this would be HTTP/HTTPS traffic we could create a customer URL category in order to be used in a rule with an allow action. But when the protocol isn't HTTP/HTTPS but something like SMB or SSH and so on, I don't think the URL category will be a factor. Also creating a FQDN object is not an option since it won'd allow wildcards. Any other ideas or suggestions from your side? Many thanks and regards Tibor
... View more
04-20-2017
02:18 AM
Dear community I am looking for a way to filter all rules without any value in the description field. We use this filed to reference the incident number which has been raised to request a security rule. And by policy we are not allowed to have any rules in our set where there is not reference in the description field. So i have tried to use the filter options and especially the "does not contain" option. But somehow i have failed to get the correct syntax. For example i have tried ( description does not contain 'test' ) But this does not return any results. So i am even uncertain if the operator has to be spelled "does not contain" oder "doesnotcontain". I have tried both but none seems to work. Cheers, Tibor
... View more
09-20-2016
01:19 AM
Thanks a lot for your reply. Guess I will have to do this step by step with each individual address then.
... View more
09-20-2016
12:28 AM
Hello community I have tried to look this up in the help, but could not come up with anything useful. Therefore I thought I'd might give it a try here. I have to delete an bunch ob objects at the same time. So instead of typing one IP address and then deleting the object and do this over and over again, I though I'd better come up with one search string to filter out all addresses I need to delete. I did try to use the filter I am used to use from the policy management ( name contains 'xyz' ) or (source/member eq 'XYZ' ) and combine them with or/and. But it seems like this syntax is not working in the object management UI. Is there any documentation about what filters can be used in with menu? Or do you have any recommendation what string I can use in Object management to find let's say five or ten addresses with one serach? Many thanks for your help and best regards Tibor
... View more
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
01-07-2021
12:07 PM
|
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks