This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
About lance.wright
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- LIVEcommunity
- About lance.wright
03-25-2016
2Posts
0Likes
0Solutions
Mar 25, 2016Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by lance.wright
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1856 | 11-01-2012 07:02 AM | |
| 2073 | 10-31-2012 12:33 PM |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 10-17-2012 12:40 PM |
| Date Last Visited | 03-25-2016 09:24 AM |
| Posts | 2 |
11-01-2012
07:02 AM
Here is a screenshot of the two rules. Rule #1 is above Rule #2. I am trying to get rid of Rule #2 (as it is obviously too general. Let me know if you have any questions about the rules specifically. Thanks for looking this over.
... View more
10-31-2012
12:33 PM
I have a policy which allows icmp / ping / snmp-base / snmpv1 / snmpv2 however when I review the logs the traffic which matches this policy is being caught in a lower policy that is more general (and we are trying to get rid of). Someone told me that because icmp/ping are layer 3 and snmp is layer 7 that they cannot share a policy. I didn't believe him until I saw these results. Please say this is not the case. Any ideas?
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Configuration
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
03-25-2016
09:24 AM
|
Latest Tags
No tags yet
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2022 - Palo Alto Networks