This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About Lukas.Schmitz
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About Lukas.Schmitz
01-30-2023
6Posts
0Likes
0Solutions
Jan 30, 2023Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by Lukas.Schmitz
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 822 | 02-18-2022 05:35 AM | |
| 1434 | 10-18-2021 11:49 PM | |
| 1513 | 10-18-2021 12:28 AM | |
| 992 | 09-17-2020 11:03 PM | |
| 2272 | 12-12-2019 03:35 AM |
Posts I Liked
| Subject | Likes | Author | Latest Post |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Like | |||
| 1 Like |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 11-03-2016 07:59 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 01-30-2023 10:03 AM |
| Posts | 6 |
02-18-2022
05:35 AM
Hello Guys,
we are in the middle of a Migration from Checkpoint R81.x to Palo Alto. The Auto Zone assignment Feature in the Security Policies is working like a Charm, however it´s not working in the NAT Policies. As soon as we are using this Feature, we don´t have the original 90 NAT Rules. Expedition is showing us roughly 1700 Rules. I get the Point that we can´t have more than 1 Destination Zone configured per NAT Policy and therefore Expedition is creating multiple Policies for it, but i can see that we have many duplicated Policies which were created from Expedition. We are using Expedition in Version 1.2.12. Is there any known Issue in this Version ? Are we doing something wrong ?
Kind regards!
... View more
10-18-2021
11:49 PM
@azuniga, thank you for your Update! This has confirmed my assumption and solved my Issue.
... View more
10-18-2021
12:28 AM
Hello All,
we have done a Migration from Checkpoint (R80.20) to Palo Alto with Expedition. Everything is working good and the Configuration is already imported into the new 5200 Cluster. Since there are more than 3000 Security Policies, we have done some checks to make sure that all Options and Zones are there (Auto Zone assignment worked really well!).
Now, we have faced an Issue with User-ID. All the Security Policies from Checkpoint with Users assigned to it have been migrated, but the Source is always ANY. When i check the User-ID under Objects, it is also empty. Is there any Way to migrate the User-ID Infos as well ?
Best regards
... View more
09-17-2020
11:03 PM
Hey Community, maybe someone can give me a hint or help about the following Topic: Does Wildfire re-checks Files after we have got a verdict ? For example, if a File is uploaded to Wildfire and the verdict is Benign, but after some Time something has changed in this File and it now has a malicious behaviour, does Wildfire checks the File after some File again ? Kind regards
... View more
12-12-2019
03:35 AM
Hello, we tried to figure out if it´s possible to use HIP Profiles on Global Protect Client Configuration. We want to ristrict the User who is not matching the HIP Profile to connect to the Gateway. Normally, you can configure the HIP Objects on Policys, but we don´t want the user even connect to the VPN. Is there any Way we can do this ? Kind regards
... View more
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
01-30-2023
10:03 AM
|
Latest Tags
No tags yet
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks