This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About jdemery
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About jdemery
10Posts
1Like
1Solution
Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by jdemery
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 4098 | 10-02-2018 12:55 PM | |
| 9640 | 04-26-2018 04:56 AM | |
| 9664 | 04-25-2018 05:19 AM | |
| 4757 | 10-09-2017 10:16 AM | |
| 4767 | 10-09-2017 08:16 AM |
My Liked Posts
| Subject | Likes | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Like | 07-24-2017 06:02 AM |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 05-09-2017 11:32 AM |
| Date Last Visited | |
| Posts | 10 |
| Total Likes Received | 1 |
10-02-2018
12:55 PM
Is anyone using the following Proof Point prototype: proofpoint.EmergingThreatsIPs?
The prototype allows you to select certain categories once added as node however it looks like the categories listed within minemeld are not matching up to what Proof Point is actually categorizing these IP's as. For example ip's are coming in with a category of " Mobile_Spyware_CNC" according to the minemeld log but are actually categorized as Remoteaccess on Proof Point's portal.
Being that the Proof Point feeds have a wide range of categories including IP's that one may not want blocked this is a issue. Alternatively the Proof Point Domain feed (proofpoint.EmergingThreatsDomains) does not seem to have this issue as all of the doman names coming in with their various categorizations are matching up with what Proof Point has listed on their side.
... View more
04-26-2018
04:56 AM
Thanks Menachem.
... View more
04-25-2018
05:19 AM
Curious if Cortex XDR has the ability to ingest logs from DHCP, DNS and Activey Directory domain controllers for analyzation along with logs being sent from any firewalls.
... View more
10-09-2017
10:16 AM
I do not, no. I use the autofocus hosted minemeld so it's not really something we ever considered doing.
... View more
10-09-2017
08:16 AM
We have a URL EDL setup using the OpenPhish miner that comes with Minemeld (openphish.feed miner) that a deny rule is matching against. We have never had any issues with it blocking legitimate URL's but a few days ago the deny rule that matches against the OpenPhish EDL started blocking legitimate sites such as www.youtube.com, www.dell.com, www.oxford.com and many more. This started occurring after our FW refreshed the EDL at 04:00 EDT on 10/07/2017. The EDL then did it's next scheduled refresh at 05:00 EDT on 10/07/2017 and the legitimate URL's that were getting blocked were being allowed through.
Unfortunately it looks like I can only search back to late in the day on 10/08 in the node logs so I can't see what URL's were added prior to the 04:00 refresh on 10/07. Im curious if anyone else on here who happens to use the openphish.feed miner experienced the same?
... View more
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks