This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About Hongson
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About Hongson
08-21-2020
22Posts
1Like
1Solution
Aug 21, 2020Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by Hongson
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1393 | 05-28-2018 06:53 PM | |
| 1412 | 05-25-2018 05:16 AM | |
| 2402 | 03-26-2018 10:39 PM | |
| 2443 | 03-24-2018 06:46 PM | |
| 2460 | 03-24-2018 01:25 AM |
My Liked Posts
| Subject | Likes | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Like | 10-27-2017 12:58 AM |
Posts I Liked
| Subject | Likes | Author | Latest Post |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Like | |||
| 1 Like | |||
| 3 Likes | |||
| 1 Like | |||
| 2 Likes |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 05-15-2017 09:37 PM |
| Date Last Visited | 08-21-2020 01:37 AM |
| Posts | 22 |
| Total Likes Received | 1 |
05-25-2018
05:16 AM
Dear all, I want to permit HRT members access a recruitment website called "https://www.vietnamworks.com". I create a security rule permit them to access a URL_category named "HRT_recruitment". In "HRT_recruitment" category I added "*.vietnamworks.*" and "vietnamworks.*" and even "www.vietnamworks.com" but It doesn't work. I checked traffic log, Traffic was not allowed by "HRT_recruiment" rule, traffic passed it and went to "All_deny" rule. So traffics were denied. Many other URLs have same issue. But this issue just happen sometime ago, It worked normally before. Maybe it started when the content version transitions from the 3-digit version numbering scheme to the new 4-digit version numbering scheme. My FW running 8.0.5 software version, Application version 8024-4749
... View more
03-26-2018
10:39 PM
Thank you all for your help, 'Cause the default route is connection to ISP-2 so I've to create a pbf rule redict it to ISP-1. And found out that my pbf rule configuration missed Next hop IP ( I thought that only Egress interface is enough). Problem has been solved now 🙂
... View more
03-24-2018
06:46 PM
Thank you Raido for your reply. I use pbf also, because by default traffics from my server go outside via ISP-2 so I created a pbf rule redirect traffic to ISP-1. I also add an IP in the new IP range to ISP-1 interface. I've no ploblem when NAT using the old IP range, but when using the new IP range, connection failed.
... View more
03-24-2018
01:25 AM
Dear all, I've 2 internet lines connected to 2 different ISP: ISP-1 and ISP-2. Default route to internet is the connection to ISP-2 I just bought 1 more public IP range from ISP-1 that belong to a different subnet with my current ISP-1 public IP range. Now I want to NAT my server using an IP in the new public IP range, but server cannot connect to internet. I've checked logs and see no problem (NAT is successfull, securitiy rules is allowed). I've no problem if I NAT using current old public IP range. So is there any configuration I have to do before using the new IP range for NAT?
... View more
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
08-21-2020
01:37 AM
|
Likes Given To
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks