This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About vladimir.stepanov
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About vladimir.stepanov
02-25-2021
6Posts
1Like
0Solutions
Feb 25, 2021Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by vladimir.stepanov
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 7333 | 07-02-2019 03:54 AM | |
| 7352 | 07-02-2019 03:27 AM | |
| 7457 | 07-02-2019 02:59 AM | |
| 6448 | 11-30-2018 01:43 AM | |
| 6620 | 11-29-2018 07:35 AM | |
| 9082 | 11-29-2018 02:56 AM |
My Liked Posts
| Subject | Likes | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Like | 11-29-2018 07:35 AM |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 07-22-2017 03:09 PM |
| Date Last Visited | 02-25-2021 05:59 AM |
| Posts | 6 |
| Total Likes Received | 1 |
07-02-2019
03:54 AM
yes, I understand that I cannot rely on them since paloalto doesn't maintain it. But the question is what to use instead to block traffic from well-known malicious IP addresses. Ok, I mean well-known to other companies, not to paloalto, since their feeds are empty 🙂
... View more
07-02-2019
03:27 AM
But why it is like this, was there any announce or answer from paloalto? It is clear that 600 Ip addresses are nothing, also, before they had 10 times bigger list. So what, have paloalto failed with this feature and cannot support it anymore?
... View more
07-02-2019
02:59 AM
Hello, I am checking the content of two predefined dynamic IP lists for high risky IP addresses and known malicious IP addresses and they are too small, just 613 addresses in total. There is a document https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/8-0/pan-os-new-features/content-inspection-features/palo-alto-networks-malicious-ip-address-feeds and there we can find that at the time of writing there were 2969 IP addresses only in high risky list. So the question, if it can be some problem with feed updates on our appliances or it is the actual size of these lists. Regards, Vladimir
... View more
11-30-2018
01:43 AM
Ok, thanks everybody, I am going to report them about this mistake. Just strange that this is mentioned in several sources.
... View more
11-29-2018
07:35 AM
1 Kudo
At first I have seen it in the paloalto online course for Pan-OS 8.1, module about Site-to-Site VPN, IKE Gateway configuration. After I started to search and found the same in the PAN-OS Admin Guide 8.0 - Page 691
... View more
11-29-2018
02:56 AM
Hello dear colleagues, according to the documentation, there is a limitation for IKE gateways: All IKE gateways configured on the same interface or local IP address must use the same crypto profile. (c) The same restriction is mentioned in the PANOS v8.1 course. First of all, it seems strange that we cannot use different IKE options for different peers. Second, I use different IKE Crypto Profiles for different IKE gateways on the same public interface without any problem. I can see that they do use different algorithms for encrypting, hashing, DH group, etc. So it works. Is it some obsolete information they just forgot to remove? Regards, Vladimir Stepanov
... View more
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
02-25-2021
05:59 AM
|
Latest Tags
No tags yet
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks