This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About nson2139
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About nson2139
09-04-2021
44Posts
1Like
0Solutions
Sep 04, 2021Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by nson2139
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1305 | 09-03-2021 12:16 AM | |
| 1693 | 09-03-2021 12:10 AM | |
| 1798 | 08-24-2021 08:54 AM | |
| 1526 | 08-03-2021 03:15 AM | |
| 1310 | 05-11-2021 08:29 PM |
My Liked Posts
| Subject | Likes | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Like | 11-29-2018 09:00 PM |
Posts I Liked
| Subject | Likes | Author | Latest Post |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Like | |||
| 1 Like |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 01-22-2018 11:44 PM |
| Date Last Visited | 09-04-2021 12:14 AM |
| Posts | 44 |
| Total Likes Received | 1 |
09-03-2021
12:16 AM
Team, On our Palo's we have a vsys defined and on this vsys we have 2 zones configured. ...... (say Trust zone and untrust zone.) We have a server in the trust zone which need to monitor the interface allocated to the untrust zone. This does not happen i.e. the server is unable to telnet to the untrust interface(to the port we enabled) and hence monitoring fails. However, the entire network can still do this telnet(i.e. network other than the trust side). Any suggestions? We unfortunately do not have packet capture rights to debug this and hence the question. Thanks! N.
... View more
09-03-2021
12:10 AM
Hello, Sorry for the delayed response. Will eBGP Multihop also work? i.e. without creating a IPSec tunnel Other than BGP peering no other requirements we have Thanks!! N.
... View more
08-24-2021
08:54 AM
Folks, Similar to Cisco routers we are checking if we can form remote eBGP neighbors between Palo Altos located in different DC's. One PA is located in DC-01 and the second is located in DC-02 We are looking at this design to as both these Palo's form BGP on a IPSec tunnel to a customer location. As of now the failover is manual and we should be able to automate that is we can get a eBGP setup between these 2 firewalls. Any suggestion on the eBGP part? Regards, N!
... View more
08-03-2021
03:15 AM
Team, We have a BGP neighbor on our Palo Alto with a Transit Gateway in the AWS. This BGP is formed from our Site A to the AWS TGW. Now, we want to form another BGP from our Site B to the AWS TGW. Site A should be preferred always and we know we can do that using the AS-path-prepends. However, one additional requirement is that both the sites should advertise only the RFC 1918 IP's and the default route that we have. How can we achieve that? The off course we will prepend that from Site B. Regards!! N.
... View more
05-11-2021
08:29 PM
Team, Any one aware if we can even use the Panaroma a a central manager for the Cisco AnyConnect firewall? My use cases are: 1. Central management and to push policies to the Cisco AnyConnect. 2. Ensure policies are in sync and same across all AnyConnect nodes. 3. Possible backup of the Cisco AnyConnect configuration. 4. Possible historic logs storing and any telemetry data. 🙂 I am not sure if this is too much of an ask. Thanks!! N.
... View more
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
09-04-2021
12:14 AM
|
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks