This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About NathanielM
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About NathanielM
11-12-2020
8Posts
3Likes
0Solutions
Nov 12, 2020Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by NathanielM
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 5782 | 12-18-2019 03:17 AM | |
| 6981 | 10-03-2019 09:43 AM | |
| 7822 | 01-14-2019 01:16 PM | |
| 10573 | 10-27-2018 04:10 AM | |
| 3339 | 10-27-2018 03:59 AM | |
| 10580 | 10-27-2018 03:51 AM | |
| 14744 | 10-20-2018 12:56 PM | |
| 4725 | 09-15-2018 11:16 AM |
My Liked Posts
| Subject | Likes | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Like | 12-18-2019 03:17 AM | |
| 1 Like | 01-14-2019 01:16 PM | |
| 1 Like | 10-27-2018 04:10 AM |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 02-26-2018 07:07 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 11-12-2020 12:24 PM |
| Posts | 8 |
| Total Likes Received | 3 |
12-18-2019
03:17 AM
1 Kudo
Hi, Can I request that the devs urgently build the capability to use secondary tunnels to AWS when using dynamic routing (BGP). This is listed as a known issue but I'm not sure if it is on the roadmap for a future release: https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/prisma/prisma-access/prisma-access-panorama-release-notes/prisma-access-about/prisma-access-known-issues.html CYR-7814 - Secondary tunnels are not supported with Prisma Access/AWS integrations that use dynamic (BGP) routing. Thanks
... View more
10-03-2019
09:43 AM
Looks like the bug is still there (although not for me). I'm afraid I have no answer other than a brand new VM with a newer version that Palo Alto made available. Are no Palo engineers monitoring these threads anymore?
... View more
01-14-2019
01:16 PM
1 Kudo
Sorry about the delay.
I blew the VM back in October as Palo Alto now have a higher version to download. I'm on 1.0.107 now, which I belive was a fresh download then one update.
So far it seems to be ok but I've only tested it with 1 Cisco config (the exact same one it wouldn't work with before) and one Checkpoint.
What version are you on?
... View more
10-27-2018
04:10 AM
1 Kudo
Thought it might be useful to show the merging process I am doing. Of course I am starting to task manager first before entering a project. stage 1 stage 2 stage 3 stage 4 stage 5
... View more
10-27-2018
03:59 AM
Is the config output just your original base config with none of the migrated peices?
I'm having the same problem if so.
... View more
10-27-2018
03:51 AM
It seems as though there is no such file or directory when I run this command.
... View more
10-20-2018
12:56 PM
Hi,
After trying and failing on Expedition 1.0.95 with no luck I have now deleted my VM and downloaded and updated to 1.0.107.
Whenever I migrate (tried Cisco, Checkpoint and Juniper), I click export, drag the elements into the base config, press merge then generate xml. I'm left with what looks like the original base config instead of a xml output.
All the migrated work is lost.
What is the sequence from when I am ready to generate an xml?
By the way the configs and base config are fine as I've used them before in the Migration Tool 3.3.15
Thanks
... View more
09-15-2018
11:16 AM
I'm having major issues too.
ASA Version 9.1(5)21 not importing any config
ASA Version 9.7(1) not generating any useful xml output.
Will email fwmigrate@paloaltonetworks.com
... View more
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
11-12-2020
12:24 PM
|
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks