This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About JohnOlav
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About JohnOlav
03-17-2023
1Post
0Likes
0Solutions
Mar 17, 2023Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by JohnOlav
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2203 | 10-04-2018 02:53 AM |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 03-26-2018 02:27 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 03-17-2023 05:52 AM |
| Posts | 1 |
10-04-2018
02:53 AM
Hi, I'm going to migrate a Juniper SRX firewall with a Palo Alto VM-500 firewall. The case: The Juniper firewall is configured with multiple virtual routers. Between this routers we can static NAT subnets. As showed in the picture below, we have 2 virtual routers. If Subnet 192.168.1.0/24 behind VR A should reach Subnet 192.168.2.0/24 behind VR B, we have a static NAT from zone A that NAT'ing 172.16.2.0/24<->192.168.2.0/24 to VR B. You can then use 172.16.2.x from VR A to reach the 192.168.2.x in VR B. This is done because of a subnet overlap (192.168.2.0/24 in VR A is bound to a VPN tunnel) How can I solve this in the Palo Alto?
... View more
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
03-17-2023
05:52 AM
|
Latest Tags
No tags yet
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks