03-03-2023 05:39 AM
we have 2 new 5410 that I'm trying to set up for active/active. we have 2 ISPs a single physical content filter and a single core switch. I know there will be some fail point with the single core and content filter. my question is so i need to wire my 2nd palo to my 2 isp switches and then to my core I've attached a picture, hopefully this will make it clearer.
thanks
03-03-2023 11:11 AM
Yes, each PaloAlto will need a cable to each ISP/content filter switch and to the core switch. Your drawing doesn't label it but I am assuming the top 2 devices at the incoming switches. Then the HA ports need to be cross connected between the PaloAltos. So the cabling would look like:
ISP1 -> Switch1 -> e/1 PaloAlto1
-> e/1 PaloAlto2
ISP2 -> Switch2 -> e/2 PaloAlto1
-> e/2 PaloAlto2
PaloAlto1 e/5 -> CoreSwitch
PaloAlto2 e/5 -> CoreSwitch
PaloAlto1 HA1-A -> HA1-A PaloAlto2
PaloAlto1 HA1-B -> HA1-B PaloAlto2
PaloAlto1 HA2/3 -> HA2/3 PaloAlto2
It's important to remember that in an Active-Active HA pair, the PaloAltos are not load sharing with a common configuration. Each is working with a particular active configuration and takes over the configuration running on its mate if the mate fails (i.e. PaloAlto1 runs config A, PaloAlto2 runs config B, if PaloAlto1 fails then PaloAlto2 runs A and B). In an Active-Passive configuration one unit runs the entire configuration and the other is monitoring/waiting to take over if the first fails.
03-03-2023 11:11 AM
Yes, each PaloAlto will need a cable to each ISP/content filter switch and to the core switch. Your drawing doesn't label it but I am assuming the top 2 devices at the incoming switches. Then the HA ports need to be cross connected between the PaloAltos. So the cabling would look like:
ISP1 -> Switch1 -> e/1 PaloAlto1
-> e/1 PaloAlto2
ISP2 -> Switch2 -> e/2 PaloAlto1
-> e/2 PaloAlto2
PaloAlto1 e/5 -> CoreSwitch
PaloAlto2 e/5 -> CoreSwitch
PaloAlto1 HA1-A -> HA1-A PaloAlto2
PaloAlto1 HA1-B -> HA1-B PaloAlto2
PaloAlto1 HA2/3 -> HA2/3 PaloAlto2
It's important to remember that in an Active-Active HA pair, the PaloAltos are not load sharing with a common configuration. Each is working with a particular active configuration and takes over the configuration running on its mate if the mate fails (i.e. PaloAlto1 runs config A, PaloAlto2 runs config B, if PaloAlto1 fails then PaloAlto2 runs A and B). In an Active-Passive configuration one unit runs the entire configuration and the other is monitoring/waiting to take over if the first fails.
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!