- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
Enhanced Security Measures in Place: To ensure a safer experience, we’ve implemented additional, temporary security measures for all users.
04-15-2011 07:38 AM
I probably already know the answer to this, but I have to ask anyway. Does PA support EIGRP for dynamic routing? :smileyconfused:
-mike
04-15-2011 09:10 AM
Hi Mike,
EIGRP is a Cisco proprietary protocol. The dynamic routing protocols supported on the PAN are RIPv2, OSPF and BGP.
04-15-2011 09:10 AM
Hi Mike,
EIGRP is a Cisco proprietary protocol. The dynamic routing protocols supported on the PAN are RIPv2, OSPF and BGP.
04-09-2013 03:15 PM
Cisco is opening Eigrp right now link
I hope PAN will in the next future develop its version of Eigrp (IETF as an Informational RFC - this means that algorithm core will remain Cisco proprietary).
This could be a interesting feature, much faster, simpler and reliable than ospf/rip.
04-10-2013 06:51 AM
Nice! I did not know that! I never thought I'd see them open up EIGRP
04-10-2013 06:51 AM
So if an answer's incorrect but is marked answered, what's the procedure?
04-10-2013 11:52 AM
what is done is done 🙂 no turning back
04-14-2013 08:21 AM
Post a reply to alert us of any issues you encounter so we can review and resolve.
Thanks,
PAN Agent
01-18-2014 11:04 PM
I had no idea they were opening it up. Interesting. I wonder how PAN will react.
01-19-2014 08:49 AM
We are coming up on one year since the announcement by Cisco and PAN's reaction is the same as every other vendor, ignore this faux open standard.
Many have commented on the issues but they basically boil down to these main problems with the Cisco EIGRP "open" standard. This is only an informational RFC on the state of a basic feature set. Cisco is NOT giving the EIGRP over to a standards body in any sense of the term. They maintain control of all future development and they held back any of the advanced features they did not want to see competition on i.e. dmvpn implementations.
This whole setup essentially means that EIGRP is still a proprietary standard with only a subset "open" for implementation by the industry.
01-20-2014 01:35 PM
So to reply to myself, I think Steven Puluka 's answer sufficiently refutes me saying that "EIGRP isn't proprietary" so it worked itself out! 🙂
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!