- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
04-12-2013 01:25 PM
I noticed that in the release notes for PANOS 5.0.4, there was a reasonably serious security issue pointed out:
To me this is kind of a big deal... being able to download the equivalent of a 'show tech' could reveal at the very least the entire firewall's configuration, right?
That's what led me to creating this thread... does PA issue security advisories for their products? I wouldn't have even noticed this issue existed or was fixed in 5.0.4 if I hadn't pulled down and read the release notes.
04-12-2013 01:48 PM
Yes, you can find them here: http://securityadvisories.paloaltonetworks.com
It would probably be best to consult your local Palo Alto SE about that ticket and the details.
04-12-2013 01:48 PM
Yes, you can find them here: http://securityadvisories.paloaltonetworks.com
It would probably be best to consult your local Palo Alto SE about that ticket and the details.
04-12-2013 01:55 PM
The interesting thing is that 46728 isn't listed at http://securityadvisories.paloaltonetworks.com/ ...
04-12-2013 02:25 PM
umphmharding wrote:
It would probably be best to consult your local Palo Alto SE about that ticket and the details.
I can see the details myself!
If I do a 'wget https://my-PA-firewall/device/export.file.php' I can pull a generated tech support file without being authenticated!
04-12-2013 05:37 PM
It is an issue, and it was fixed, but best practice is to lock down your management interface to a few select IP addresses belonging to your administrators.
04-13-2013 01:17 AM
But that doesnt matter.
The firewall (specially if its a modern NGFW from the 21th century) should be able to protect itself.
That is force authentication before you can do anything remotely close to management of the device.
That is default deny which all PA slides talk about regarding PA's security policy.
Would be great if a PA representative could add some info in this thread regarding why 46728 doesnt show up on the Submit Form list?
This security hole is as bad as the backdoor in DLINK equipment described in:
http://www.devttys0.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/dlink_php_vulnerability.pdf
Or for that matter the nice backdoor into TP-LINK equipment:
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!