This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About birkhojk
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About birkhojk
03-08-2023
12Posts
5Likes
1Solution
Mar 08, 2023Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by birkhojk
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1081 | 06-27-2022 11:46 AM | |
| 1772 | 06-23-2022 11:22 AM | |
| 1850 | 06-22-2022 05:57 AM | |
| 1963 | 06-17-2022 06:47 AM | |
| 857 | 04-04-2022 11:17 AM |
My Liked Posts
| Subject | Likes | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Like | 06-22-2022 05:57 AM | |
| 4 Likes | 09-30-2016 12:38 PM |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 11-06-2014 12:24 PM |
| Date Last Visited | 03-08-2023 11:38 AM |
| Posts | 12 |
| Total Likes Received | 5 |
10-22-2020
02:21 PM
This is probably a stupid question, but if I just create another Layer-3 sub-interface off of an existing physically connected interface, and TAG that sub interface, that is all I need to do to bring a tagged trunk in through an existing physical connection right? Excluding, zones, virtual routers, policies, and all that other stuff, but the connectivity itself. Say I have ethernet 1/1, which is Layer-3 10.0.0.1/30 and it has no tag or is UNTAGGED (i.e. no 802.1q) and let's say it is in the Inside Zone. I could re-use that same physical connection ethernet 1/1 right and assign it say... ethernet 1/1.123 TAG 123 Layer-3 192.168.0.1/30 My_Other_Zone Doing that will not adversely impact my physical untagged connectivity right?
... View more
07-02-2019
07:35 AM
Good Morning: What is the recommended version for the Palo Alto 3050 series firewalls? We are currently running 8.1.8 What are your thoughts on 9.0.2-h4? Are there any problems with it, or should we more likely than not be good to go?
... View more
07-02-2019
07:20 AM
Have not seen this. Was working with it yesterday, and as you know without Decryption enabled, you cannot even read the full URL; since, the Client Hello provies only the domain name. What I learned is to be able to see the URL in the Monitor tab, you need to enable URL filtering on the security policy that matches up with some decryption. At any rate, we have been using a lot of * asterisks. For example: example.com/noaccess/* Have you tried that?
... View more
07-05-2017
11:54 AM
Good Afternoon... Today, I had my management request a User Activity Report, and it was pointed out that the report no longer contains "Detailed Web Browsing Activity" within the PDF. This is the section that used to show the Application, Category, Action, and URL as well as Browse Time. The only change I can think of is that recently we have upgraded to PanOS 8.0.x; specifically, we are running 8.0.3 at the moment. ************ What we are offerend now when clicking "Detailed Browsing" is a separate "URL Logs" spreadsheet, but this is not in the format managment wants. Is there a remedy? Thank you Sincerely, Justin
... View more
04-13-2017
12:37 PM
Actually the Tunnel interfaces themselves are GRE even though it does nto say that anywhere... Wghen you get a padlock next to it, the interface is encrypted via IPSec.... That is the same as a security association on the Cisco. Please see this artlce. https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Configuration-Articles/How-to-Configure-IPSec-VPN/ta-p/56535
... View more
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks