Thank you for your response. Watchguard has its market share in UK and some European countries. I had 3 migration requests over the last half a year, although I did it manually or building from scratch, but this current one seems to be more conifg which will need some automation. I will try to get a config to share.
@BatD I ended up taking a mixed approach. The security policies on the Watchguard were less than a 100 so I got the table from the web interface and moved it to an Excel spreadsheet. From there worked out the address objects and address groups and put then in PANW format in a different spreadsheet.
Once I had the basic policy looking like a PANW policy, I used Pandevice (https://pandevice.readthedocs.io/en/latest/configtree.html) to write a script and load the policies and objects onto the new firewalls.
The NATs on the other hand, was a completely manual process as I had to match all the possible traffic flows. It was a bit of a process but once I got the first FW correct the other 3 were fairly straight forward.
@alestevez I agree with you, Watchguards are not common on the enterprise but as businesses grow and mature they are moving to an enterprise platform, hence the question. PA-200 wouldn't be considered enterprise for example but they are good enough for remote sites or small business that want to take a step towards modern firewalls. I can get you a configuration file from one of the old boxes.
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!