Feature Request List

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Feature Request List

L7 Applicator

Hi community

 

In a lot of topics there are discussions and questions about PAN-OS enhancements and missing (not yet implemented) features. So far the PaloAlto Feature Request list isn't available to the public but in a lot of these existing topics feature request IDs (FR ID) are mentionned. Even knowing that PAN-OS is already a feature rich firewall operating system, there is always room for improvement, so I thought it might be helpful for others (and myself) to collect these existing public available FR IDs and summarize them in one topic.

 

ID Description Additional Information/Workaround Implemented in
130 Filter Logs by Adress Groups - -
204 Automatic rollback to last "good" configuration - -
241 SMTP authentication in Email server profile - -
339 Add negate function to all security policy columns    
776 increase custom report limit beyound Top 500 Also in FR ID 1636 and 1693 -
889 Mac Address as match criteria in security policy - -
913 Preview response pages directly in the WebUI without having to download them - -
919 Support for ICAP (Internet Content Adaption Protocol) - -
986 Custom Reports for System logs - -
1172 Ignore usergroup from User-ID - -
1225 Participation of PA firewalls in Spannin Tree - -
1370 URL column length limit in Reports - -
1696 Include Interface IP in SNMP MIB - -
2153 Terminal Server Agent for Linux - -
2287 Different ACLs for https, snmp, ... - -
2666 VRRP Support for clusters between PA and other devices - -
2924 Optain Global Protect IP from DHCP Server - -
3051 User Activity Report Enhancement (detailed web-browsing statistics including time spent) - -
3060 DHCPv6 client support - -
3495 Custom reports for system Logs - -
3591 /31 subnetmask support for HA1 link - -
4035 Dedicated Log category for Global Protect - -
4443 Support for USB modems (3G/4G/5G ...) - -
4454 gray out policies with expired schedules - -
4507 Show current interface bandwidth in a dashboard widget and log over time. - Not a dashboard widget but throughbut statistics and other device health metrics are implemented in PAN-OS 8.1
4603 Concurrent GP VPN session limit per User - -
4669 Generate system log upon schedule end - -
4670 Proactive notification for policies with soon expiring scheduled - -
4788 Block emails based on domains in "to", "cc" or "bcc", also log these in addition to only "to" and reply with smtp 541 when blocked - -
4920 Display SFP, SFP+ and QSFP serial number - -
5000 SCEP Server integrated in the firewall - -
5078 per-IP Traffic shaping - -
5357 Global Protect Agent Uninstall Password - -
5612 Automatically disable and remove policies with expired schedules - -
5678 Log the TLS version of websites and enable reporting about this - -
5686 DHCP Client Class-ID Setting - -
5844 BGP SNMP monitorings - -
6186 Log and report search keywords - -
6548 Customizable SMTP Response for Vulnerability Protection - -
6609 Add "Threat Email" to email subject when something malicious was detected and also log "cc" and "bcc" - -
7365 DHCPv6 Server support - -
7654 Support of DIPP with non-strict recognition by devices (Cisco ASA like) - -
7832 User-ID for Azure-AD authenticated users - -
9113 Integrated addressobjects for well-known cloud services - -
9195 OCSP stapling support for inbound decryption - -
9285 Custom configrable MFA integration - -
9509 DoH (DNS over HTTPS)/DoT (DNS over TLS) Support for DNS Sinkhole Feature - -
9522 App-ID for DoH (DNS over HTTPS) / DoT (DNS over TLS) Custom App-ID for DoH -
9563 Configurable Time when Global Protect Captive Portal Notification should be shown Captive Portal Notification Delay GlobalProtect 4.1
9958 Azure Information Protection (AIP) Tag support for Data Filtering Release Notes Content Version 8129 PAN-OS 8.0 starting with Content Update 8129
10173 Automatically open browser when Global Protects a Captive Portal and opens a configurable website Automatically Launch Webpage in Default Browser Upon Captive Portal Detection Global Protect 5.0.4 starting with Content Update 8181
10931 use logd disk space (33%) for elasric search in Panorama Panorama disk space allocation -
11012 Windows Server 2019 Support for User-ID Agent - User-ID Agent/PAN-OS 9.0.2
11153 Completely remove Global Protect 4.0 Design out of Global Protect 5+ - -
11211 Forced Global Protect network rediscover after IP change - -
11251 Panorama High Availability: MFA using SAML (Okta) - -
11524 Use FIB for route monitoring instead of gateway of the route itself - -
11763 Include the username in the csv with the URL logs when running a user activity report Download thelogs directly from the URL logs -
11764 Allow for more "User Activity Report" customization - pie charts, different bar charts, color, tables, etc. - -
11765 WebUI Color/Theme changes (Dark mode) already possible with some browser extensions (or maybe even directly in the browser) by modifying the css -
12264 Reporting based on HIP match failures, specially which failed items - -
12783 Log E-Mail links forwarded to Wildfire - -
13046 Support gMSA accounts for User-IP-Mappings - -
13414 Negate source User - -
15246 Import/Export ACC and Dashboard Widgets. - -

 

So far I found a few and I'll try to update this topic regularly. If you also know about existing requests, please write them here.

 

Regards,

Remo

151 REPLIES 151


@dsebalj wrote:

Hi all,

Here's the list of FRs submitted to PA:

NSFR-I-29197 - Share config objects between Panorama Templates:
Description:
I would like to have better support for using Panorama templates and template stacks so you can truly build your configuration like pieces of puzzle, referencing objects from other templates (something like we have for device-groups). For example, as of now, if you have one template where you define all of your interfaces (e.g. Network Baseline) and have another template where you would like to configure things like management profile, IKE gateways, etc. (anything that needs a reference to an interface), it is not possible without configuring "dummy" objects in a relevant template and than overriding things on the template stack level, which is a bit cumbersome.

It would be nice to have a "true" inheritance between the templates so you can combine multiple things from various templates to build the necessary configuration for the firewall.

NSFR-I-29198 - Automatic certificate selection for embedded browser:

Description:
Problem is when a user is redirected back to the SP (Palo Alto), since this communication is not controlled via GlobalProtect (instead, the GP's handler is waiting for the control to be passed back by the external browser), a user is prompted for the certificate. This could be suppressed by implementing Edge policy "AutoSelectCertificateForUrls), but there are other issues with this approach and it's just a workaround for what should have been available/implemented within the embedded browser.

Let me clarify further, by looking at the webview2 API reference: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.web.webview2.core?view=webview2-dotnet-1.0.35... - there are:

1. CoreWebView2ClientCertificate
2. CoreWebView2ClientCertificateRequestedEventArgs

These two classes should provide exactly what is needed here. Since the GP config knows about the OID we want to use, instead of prompting user for a certificate (default webview2 behavior), it should lookup for the OID from the client configuration, lookup the certificate store and make automatic selection.


@dsebalj -- For your first one I would look into Strata Cloud Manager and their config "snipits" I think they're called.  I understand what you're talking about and can see it's value.  I'm just not sure Palo is going to put engineering time against it.  While there's always going to be a need for an on-prem manager solution to support FedRamp Palo is really pushing customers to their cloud/SCM solution.  Which I think in a year or 2 will probably be a strong alternative to Panorama.

@Brandon_Wertz I see your point Brandon and it's a valid one. On the other hand, I believe Palo should continue to develop/enhance their products as long as they don't reach the EOL/EOS. 

  • 112512 Views
  • 151 replies
  • 21 Likes
Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!

The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!