Enhanced Security Measures in Place:   To ensure a safer experience, we’ve implemented additional, temporary security measures for all users.

Clarification on App Rule - I thought I understood this

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Clarification on App Rule - I thought I understood this

L4 Transporter

I recently moved a firewall into being managed by Panorama.  I setup an Application rule specifying the application as PANORAMA which includes the ports necessary (I assumed) for Panorama communications but the firewall could not be added successfully until I allowed port 3978 traffic.

 

The logs showed 3978 being recognized as SSL initially and being denied as it wasn't getting included in the rule.  What I don't understand or I guess I misunderstand, why isn't SSL allowed under that rule until the service is recognized as Panorama?  SSL is implicitly allowed under the PANORAMA application so I thought it was allowed initially under that rule on the ports the application supports.

 

What am I missing? 

 

I thought I understood it based on this article but this isn't how it seems to be working:

https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000PLLICA4

 

20 REPLIES 20

Cyber Elite
Cyber Elite

Thank you @dmifsud !

 

For whatever reason, this customer upgraded to 10.2.0 only.  Once he upgrades to the preferred release, we will check if the original rule works again.

 

Tom

Help the community: Like helpful comments and mark solutions.

What release did they fix that in (PAN-192930).  The engineer I was on the phone with before had notes he showed me from internal conversations that said it was working as intended and they didn't plan to patch/fix it.  I'd like to update him on which version this is in.

Cyber Elite
Cyber Elite

Hi @TonyDeHart ,

 

I googled PAN-192930 and found it "addressed" (fixed) in 10.1.6 and 10.2.2.

 

Thanks,

 

Tom

Help the community: Like helpful comments and mark solutions.


@TomYoung wrote:

Hi @TonyDeHart ,

 

I googled PAN-192930 and found it "addressed" (fixed) in 10.1.6 and 10.2.2.

 

Thanks,

 

Tom


Sorry I guess I could have done that...  Thank you!

 

So now the only problem is we are running 10.2.3-h4 and 10.1.9-h1 and that doesn't work.  Not sure what is fixed unless the discussion the engineer pointed out was related to this "fix" not actually being fixed.

Cyber Elite
Cyber Elite

Hi @TonyDeHart ,

 

Good to know.  I am waiting to hear back from the customer.

 

Thanks,

 

Tom

Help the community: Like helpful comments and mark solutions.

Cyber Elite
Cyber Elite

It looks like that the issue discussed in this thread has an official KB. This is expected after upgrade to PAN-OS 10.2.

 

Kind Regards

Pavel 

Help the community: Like helpful comments and mark solutions.
  • 5228 Views
  • 20 replies
  • 1 Likes
Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!

The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!