We are coming up on one year since the announcement by Cisco and PAN's reaction is the same as every other vendor, ignore this faux open standard.
Many have commented on the issues but they basically boil down to these main problems with the Cisco EIGRP "open" standard. This is only an informational RFC on the state of a basic feature set. Cisco is NOT giving the EIGRP over to a standards body in any sense of the term. They maintain control of all future development and they held back any of the advanced features they did not want to see competition on i.e. dmvpn implementations.
This whole setup essentially means that EIGRP is still a proprietary standard with only a subset "open" for implementation by the industry.
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!