cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
L0 Member
Status: New

Something that caught me out as a newbie was VLAN vs Ethernet Sub-Interfaces. May be more of a networking thing, but I'm sure I can't have been the only one. Perhaps a run down of proper use casesof each would help some.

3 Comments
L4 Transporter

The diferent is similar like a router on-stick versus un SVI.

 

I'm prefer use subinterface tagging

 

This link es very helpful

 

https://faatech.be/inter-vlan-routing-with-palo-alto-firewalls/

 

Cheers

L4 Transporter

Hello all,

 

router on a stick is only a use case.

 

A reason why you would prefer VLAN interface is if you have multiple L2 interfaces for instance.

 

I took note of the suggestion thanks.

 

Olivier

L1 Bithead

The VLAN Interface option adds routing functionality to the group as a logical Layer 3 interface. This can be useful if you have an upstream ISP router, or a different subnet connected to a Layer 3 interface that you need to interact with. You will also need to assign the VLAN interface an IP address that the clients on Layer 2 interfaces can use as a default gateway or routing next hop.

 

A Subinterface is used when the physical interface is connected to a trunked link containing VLAN (802.1Q) tagged packets. The physical interface is not able to interpret the tags, but Subinterfaces are. For each VLAN carried by the trunk, you can create a Subinterface to represent the virtual network coming from the switch. The advantage of using Subinterfaces is that each VLAN can be associated with its own security zone.

The Subinterface will mimic all the configuration specifics of its parent physical interface, but interface types cannot be different from the physical interface type (for example, a Layer 3 physical interface cannot host a Layer 2 Subinterface).

 

Recently Completed Ideas