Question from Playbook Optimization webinar: Sub-Playbook

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Question from Playbook Optimization webinar: Sub-Playbook

L5 Sessionator

I have heard from a support member that it's bad practice to go more than on sub-playbook team, ie don't have subplaybooks within subplaybooks. Can you clarify? 

 

Cortex XSOAR 

1 REPLY 1

L5 Sessionator

Reply by: @RahulVijaydev 

 

The context under which this was suggested may have dictated the suggestion, however, it is certainly not bad practice to use nested sub-playbooks, especially when you need to encapsulate logic that you expect will be repeated. Nested playbooks are ubiquitous in out of the box content i.e content produced by XSOAR

  • 1376 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Likes
Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!

The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!