- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
01-26-2024 02:22 AM
When I used the "Unused" objects filter, it lists objects that are defined in rules and groups if there is no traffic, as well as objects that aren't used at all.
We have some rules that are not used very often, but are still required, so the rules are listed as "unused" only because there has been no traffic for 30 days.
Because of this, the filter lists way more "unused" objects than there really are.
Is there any way to filter the list so it only lists address objects and groups that are not attached to any rules?
Thanks
01-26-2024 05:14 AM
Hi @ChrisC2 ,
I wanted to inform you that the default filter for unused objects is functioning as you expect. The filter is applied statically to the configuration, regardless of the number of hits per rule. As a result, if an object is marked as unused, it means that Expedition did not detect any usage in the loaded configuration (policies).
Please note that on the tools tab, you have the option to search for usages. If you select an object, you can see where it is being used.
If your Expedition is not functioning as described, please let me know, and I will request an export of your project to debug the issue.
For any further clarification, please contact fwmigrate@paloaltonetworks.com.
Thank you in advance,
David
01-26-2024 05:14 AM
Hi @ChrisC2 ,
I wanted to inform you that the default filter for unused objects is functioning as you expect. The filter is applied statically to the configuration, regardless of the number of hits per rule. As a result, if an object is marked as unused, it means that Expedition did not detect any usage in the loaded configuration (policies).
Please note that on the tools tab, you have the option to search for usages. If you select an object, you can see where it is being used.
If your Expedition is not functioning as described, please let me know, and I will request an export of your project to debug the issue.
For any further clarification, please contact fwmigrate@paloaltonetworks.com.
Thank you in advance,
David
01-31-2024 09:30 AM
Thank you for the quick reply.
Interesting, maybe I was reading something wrong.
I have 600 objects to check, and I will hopefully be going through some of them carefully tomorrow, so I'll let you know the outcome!
02-13-2024 09:45 AM
Thank you, you were correct, I think a colleague was just getting confused.
It is working as I was expecting.
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!