2X of PA820 Active/ Passive Design question

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

2X of PA820 Active/ Passive Design question

L2 Linker

Hi All

 

After some advice, planning to have 2 X PA820 pairs of Active/ Passives, Inner and outer firewalls protecting some internal networks.

 

See the diagram, Does the HA2 link pass data plane traffic at all?  Or can it?

 

There could be a scenario that one set of FW's can failover and the primary unit of one trying to speak to the standby unit of the other.  

Or is the only solution to put a switch in between the green cables FW Connect to stop this issue?

 

Capture.JPG

 

 

Thanks All

 

21 REPLIES 21

craigpaolozzi_0-1586365391961.png

 

Heres a better diagram of the full solution......so this is for an OT environment so sensitive networks.

So there are networks behind the Inner Palo Alto pair.....they will be accessed by the Cisco LAN behind the Outer Pair of Palo Altos

 

craigpaolozzi_0-1586366198672.png

Heres another of the situation I want to aviod;

 

if the active FW in the bottom pair wants to send traffic north, it will send via the passive not - which will fail

And if HA2 doesnt send the traffic to the active pair....then still the traffic is dropped

 

@craigpaolozzil,

if the active FW in the bottom pair wants to send traffic north, it will send via the passive not - which will fail

And if HA2 doesnt send the traffic to the active pair....then still the traffic is dropped

Why  do you thing this will ever be sent via the passive node? The passive node does not accept or forward any traffic, nothing is "alive" so to speak outside of your management interface. It has absolutely no way to send/receive traffic. 

 

Because the active node in the latest diagram I sent only has a link to the passive node, if that was in active mode it would be fine and would pass traffic.

@craigpaolozzi,

That would be a design flaw then. As I stated previously if you aren't going to use some sort of switch/router in the middle and directly connect these two clusters you would need to have each individual node to have it's own link to both the opposite firewalls. If that isn't done you don't have a route to the active unit and this breaks your entire design.

Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!

The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!