- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
01-12-2012 06:11 PM
Hello guys.
I have a question about IPSEC VPN tunnel and is IPSEC VPN can use PBF instead of routing or not.
I think that tunnel interface could have ip-address (for tunnel monitoring) so I guess IPSEC VPN tunnel could use PBF instead of routing?!
So I tested about that but its faild. so I wonder about it caused my missed configuration or PAN could not support IPSEC VPN with PBF.
Please let me know above question.
Thanks.
Regards.
Roh.
01-17-2012 04:03 PM
In order to get this to work properly, you need to have 2 VR's with routes, and then the PBF will overide the routes.
01-17-2012 04:03 PM
In order to get this to work properly, you need to have 2 VR's with routes, and then the PBF will overide the routes.
01-17-2012 05:05 PM
Hello jdelio
I tested again and then PBF was worked properly for IPsecVPN traffic and missed configuration when PBF not to do.
Thanks.
Regards.
Roh.
05-15-2013 05:20 AM
Hi Roh,
I have a similar scenario PBF with IPSec VPN's ..
Is it working fine for you.. if so can u please share a document or config of it.
Regards
Raj
05-16-2013 01:00 AM
Hello rparamati.
Unfortunately I don't have sample configuration for IPSecVPN with PBF that I tested. You can configure the IP to tunnel interface of both side of PAN and forward the traffic to tunnel interface using PBF rule.
If I have a chance to have testing IPSecVPN with PBF again, I will provide you a configuration of PAN.
Thanks.
Regards,
Roh
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!