- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
09-13-2010 11:38 AM
If you're referring to passthrough traffic specifically, we can NAT IPSec and GRE.
-Nick
09-14-2010 01:55 AM
I have the similar problem. I have a IPSec terminater that I want to put in a DMZ and need to do a NAT to it, is it possible ?
Regards
Jose Chaves
09-14-2010 09:39 AM
Yes, this is doable.Configure a static NAT for the VPN terminator in the DMZ. For NAT configuration example, refer to the document
https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-1517
Thx
Jerish
09-14-2010 10:09 AM
Hi,
Is also dynamic NAT (many-to-one) supported for GRE and IPSec traffic? And how many concurrent GRE tunnels are supported then?
Thanks!
09-14-2010 11:07 AM
Dynamic NAT i.e translation of IP address and port number is not supported for IPSec and GRE traffic passing through a PA firewall.
Couple of configuration workarounds
-1) Enable on NAT-T on the IPSec endpoints.
-2) If the IPSec /GRE end points have a public IP addresses, you can create a NAT rule with action no-NAT for the IPSec/GRE. This will bypass NAT for IPSec
if NAT is still required for IPSec and GRE, we do support static NAT or dynamic IP i.e only IP translation and not port numbers.
Hope this helps
10-29-2010 09:26 PM
Hello Nick,
Are you going to support the NAT traversal for IPsec VPN?
Regards,
Tomoyuki Komure
11-01-2010 09:06 PM
Hello Tomoyuki Komure,
We are currently investigating NAT traversal support for a future release. We can't say at this time when it will be supported.
Regards,
Nick Campagna
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!