- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
09-25-2013 08:16 AM
Hi,
Do you know, how this problem can be solved?
Can we use separate Virtual Routers per each Virtual System?
Best Regards
Pawel
09-25-2013 08:41 AM
Hello Pawel,
Yes. Multiple VR with multiple VSYS is the way to go.
I was able successfully commit the following configuration:
And was NOT able to commit this configuration:
So, if you configure different VSYS with different VR, you should be able to configure different interfaces with overlapping subnets.
Hope that helps!
Regards,
Kunal Adak
09-25-2013 03:58 PM
Thanks for your reply! Your answer is helpful but I meant other thing. Let say I have a few Virtual Systems that represent separate clients and each of the users has a common interface for external communications. This is solved by Shared Gateway and single Virtual Router is used to route the traffic for all of the Virtual Systems through the Shared Gateway. What if the users use overlapping addresses. Can we also use separate VR for each VSYS in this case?
Best Regards
Pawel
09-30-2013 08:24 AM
Here is a doc that explains that it is not allowed.
https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-2161
Hope this helps.
Thanks
Numan
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!