Hi, we have a customer that needs to have more visibility about the traffic in their network (applications, ports, bandwidth, vulnerabilities and virus) and will like to use PAN instead of activating NetFlow at the switch level.
This will imply that each access switch in each floor will have a span port that will mirror traffic to a tap port in PAN. Will like to understand if somebody has a previous experience with Netflow and has switched to PAN for this functionality. Will also like to understand if PAN will have any limitations compared to NetFlow.
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!