- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
Enhanced Security Measures in Place: To ensure a safer experience, we’ve implemented additional, temporary security measures for all users.
04-18-2023 02:44 PM
I have a pair of palos in azure, they are frontheaded by a LB. I also have a VPN gateway in the gateway subnet of the vnet where these components live. Not ideal but I am trying to connect a legacy vWAN hub to a new landing zone. I have a VPN from old to new using VNGs. I have a no-net from new landing zone vnets from trust to untrust so the rfc1918s head outbound without being transformed to public NAT address. But would the untrust interface just drop them anyway knowing they are RFC1918? What about when my RFC1918 from legacy vWAN come inbound to the untrust and try to route to trust? Wouldn't the untrust interface drop those also? Is there a method to to get rfc1918 traffic inbound to the untrust and forward to trust?
04-19-2023 02:17 AM
Hi @S_Williams901 ,
I am not certain what you are asking, but I have a customer with a VM-Series in Azure. He has RFC1918 IP addresses on the untrust interface, and it works fine. Azure is doing the NAT.
Thanks,
Tom
04-19-2023 07:58 AM
I see the rfc1918 in the VNG tunnel but never see it get to the untrust interface....
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!