- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
Enhanced Security Measures in Place: To ensure a safer experience, we’ve implemented additional, temporary security measures for all users.
11-08-2021 07:58 AM
Hello,
I would like to know if an upgrade that traverses multiple major versions requires testing after an upgrade to each major version?
Our upgrade path is: 8.1.15-h3 -> 8.1.20 -> 9.0 -> 9.0.14 -> 9.1 -> 9.1.11
Ideally, we would only upgrade one appliance in the cluster all the way to 9.1.11, though I know this is not recommended because appliances in a cluster should not be further than 1 major version apart.
So, the conservative path would be to break this into two stages: upgrade entire cluster to 9.0.14 and fully test? Then proceed to 9.1.11?
Thanks for any advice!
11-08-2021 08:45 AM
Hi @landoa ,
I would upgrade the entire cluster to 9.0.14, then upgrade it again to 9.1.11.
I would not test for the interim version since it is only temporary. I would implement the full test plan for 9.1.11. The TAC recommended releases are very stable.
Thanks,
Tom
11-08-2021 01:38 PM
Hello,
While testing never hurts, I have yet to have an upgrade break existing things.
Regards,
11-08-2021 11:51 PM
Thanks for this feedback.
I've done a few upgrades in the past and also never encountered problems.
However, when planning major changes, its always good to have a rollback option. If we do the upgrade in two steps (testing after each major release), I like that we can easily, and quickly, failover to the other cluster member on the old software version.
In case of problems, we have the option to rollback software, but this requires more downtime and is more intensive than a simple failover.
So, I need to decide if we want to take a bit more time with the two-step approach, or run the risk, albeit minimal, that we have to rollback.
Thanks again for your two cents!
11-09-2021 04:03 AM
I wouldn't test for the interim version as it's only temporary. I would follow the full test strategy for 9.1.11. The TAC suggested releases are extremely stable. See Palo Alto Networks exams. I'm 100% agree with you, you should need to see following paloaltonetworks link to more clear.
live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/customer-resources/support-pan-os-software-release-guidance/ta-p/258304
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!