08-02-2010 02:36 PM
We have a brand new 2050 that is going to be used to support a school district with about 5000 students.... so we expect, eventually, to have about 5000 to 6000 hosts going out to the internet. And we have access to a full class C public block.
The question that I have is: should we set this PA2050 to use a NAT pool or would setting it as "one-to-many" (where I would use only one public IP number for all my outgoing traffic) will be enough.
I would think that a pool makes more sense since it would eliminate the risk of having large amounts of traffic coming from the same IP number and therefore been tagged as spam.... but why would that matter if there would be 64K session coming from the same IP (Dynamic IP/Pool) before the next available IP gets used? Any feedback will be appreciated.
08-02-2010 03:05 PM
Best practice is using NAT with Many to One, and as long as you use threat prevention to protect your incoming/outgoing traffic that will help as well.
If you have any other questions please do let us know.
08-10-2010 07:53 AM
To add to that, the PA-2050 supports oversubscription of ports when using dynamic IP and port network address translation. If your traffic is going to diverse destinations, the source port may be used twice. So in your situation, you can support over 120,000 sessions on a single public IP. This has the obvious advantage that you can support more sessions than would be supported by the number of IPs/ports you have in your NAT pool.
User A connects to Google.com
User B connects to Yahoo.com
Since the traffic is destined to different locations, the source port may be used for both (in the case that all of your ports are occupied by NAT traffic). So the first flow, User A > Google.com, may be from public IP 184.108.40.206 and port 23001 and the second flow, User B > Yahoo.com, may also be from public IP 220.127.116.11 and port 23001. The firewall can properly route the traffic to the correct host because it has a mapping between the destination and the original source address and port.
I hope this helps!
05-26-2013 09:54 PM
I have helpful assistance by your comment.
Thanks a million.
I have more question.
What available number of same source port does FW have at different destination address???
05-27-2013 05:00 AM
Ga jang nim
Even though connect different dst address It will be used Source port about 64K
I wish You recommend me Like 乃
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!