Content translations are temporarily unavailable due to site maintenance. We apologize for any inconvenience. Visit our blog to learn more.
06-28-2013 12:53 AM
Hi,
For big environments it is advised to use user-id agent.How will we be sure ?
is there a comparison for this.User number, DC number , ??? any number ? etc...
When we should install agent software ?
Thanks.
06-28-2013 02:29 AM
Approximate Numbers:
Agentless: Small/Medium-sized Deployments and LAB Environments
Monitoring up to 20 Domain controllers and/or Exchange servers.
User-ID Agent : Large Deployments
Monitoring up 100 Domain controllers and/or Exchange servers
06-28-2013 02:29 AM
Approximate Numbers:
Agentless: Small/Medium-sized Deployments and LAB Environments
Monitoring up to 20 Domain controllers and/or Exchange servers.
User-ID Agent : Large Deployments
Monitoring up 100 Domain controllers and/or Exchange servers
06-28-2013 06:47 AM
Thanks for answer.
That makes it clear.
Regards.
06-29-2013 12:51 AM
Other thing is multi-domain with either no relation ship between us or not fully trust relation ship.
V.
07-01-2013 04:59 PM
FYI - If you are having AD servers across WAN i.e. not local to firewall, then agent-less is recommended.
The agent-less option generates only about 5% of WAN traffic as the software agent to DC communication.
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!
