- Access exclusive content
- Connect with peers
- Share your expertise
- Find support resources
new to PAN .. at the moment we have to do a concept for failover in branch offices, in the LSVPN context.
We do have 2 LSVPN Hub Palo Alto FWs in Azure in active/active, where Azure Loadbalancer balances the traffic.
Now the question is for "standard design" spoke / branch offices.
When we do have 2 ISPs in the location, both ISP lines should be used for ISP failover and bandwidth.
1. When having a pair of PA-450 in active-active mode as LSVPN satellite, is the FW througput doubled compared to active/passive?
2. What is your expirience on LSVPN, spoke PA-450 FW as active/active or active/passive, and why would you recommend the one or the other?
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!